![]() |
|
[Need More Input] [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183) +--- Thread: [Need More Input] [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes (/showthread.php?tid=166355) |
RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - SnakThree - 12-06-2018 There is no lore about vertical trade lanes so assume that it is not something to be taken within roleplay. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - Minh - 12-06-2018 What about we make it horizontal without any further in-lore explanation? There's no up or down in space after all, just a relative position to system plane. And I just realized where Digital Anvil took inspiration from. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - Thexare - 12-06-2018 I've fought with changing from upper to lower lanes on a Passenger Liner entirely too much to want to deal with the vertical lanes anymore. The sooner we change to horizontal, the better. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - Wellingtons - 12-06-2018 Personally, I aesthetically prefer the lanes positioned horizontally over vertically but I can also understand the desire to differentiate between Gallic-influenced areas and non-Gallic influenced areas, in addition, I think having lanes horizontal might make docking larger vessels easier. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - Piombo65 - 12-06-2018 Vertical. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - Kazinsal - 12-06-2018 Horizontal lanes make it so much easier to handle large ships, since you're always entering the same side of the lane. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - TheSauron - 12-06-2018 I personally find vertical lanes to be too integral to the game's aesthetics, and I know I'll end up perma-triggered should this change be made. I have also never really had any docking issues related to their vertical alignment. I voted to leave them as they are, but then, it's my personal opinion. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - DSE|= - 12-07-2018 (12-06-2018, 05:04 PM)Oxford Institute Wrote:(12-06-2018, 04:30 PM)Capt. Henry Morgan Wrote:(12-06-2018, 04:25 PM)Oxford Institute Wrote: but I am sure that they would do whatever the client asks/pays for =DSE- is already RP-ing a switch to horizontal in Poole where it has set up base to build the TL's from Caernavfon to Plymouth. Tried to get a Licence from EFL but they haven't even replied, but fortunately =DSE- has already reversed engineered the EFL horizontal trade lanes and using genuine Ageira technology can deliver. All it requires is to fit-out Scrap Palace to manufature the Horizontal trade lanes. Our Liberty Mastadon's get stuck a lot on the vertical TL's but have not once done so on the Horizontal. Plus the same entry (left) each time cuts down on productivity wastage. Big ships line up way better as the entrances are far bigger. I don't think many Battleships will find them a curse like the vertical ones. Cheers! RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - Jessitrescott - 12-07-2018 people who say vertical- aesthetics, vanilla, lets not make it gallia 2.0. people who say horizontal- fly big transports and battleships, asking it for convenience.] Horizontal all the way. RE: [Replacement Vote] Horizontal Vanilla/Ageira Trade Lanes - DSE|= - 12-07-2018 (12-06-2018, 02:28 PM)Xalrok Wrote: Look ing at these pictures, would it be too difficult to make a Sirius version of the Gallia TL's? Then we could have an improved travel experience as the Gallia TL's are bigger and not having the four electrodes jutting out means less chance of getting stuck. |