![]() |
|
Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB (/showthread.php?tid=177410) |
RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Kazinsal - 03-10-2020 (03-10-2020, 02:49 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Yes and no, it's a location code with no references. So it's trial and error for moving something, really precise movements are difficult to implement. The command you're looking for is /pos. I maintain that "technical problems" with requests have overwhelmingly been non-problems for the better part of a decade. Code: /** Print current position */RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Grumblesaur - 03-10-2020 (03-10-2020, 02:07 AM)Saronsen Wrote:(03-10-2020, 02:03 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: Says the guy who just got sanctioned. Maybe you could just stop breaking rules?edit You engaged my contribution by calling it cancer. I'm just throwing stones through the already-broken window. Besides, breaking server rules undermines your no-more-rules position per se -- all I'm doing is pointing it out. That is to say, your argument is invalid because you have a vested interest in redacting or subverting the rules. Furthermore, ![]() even if it was a fallacy, that doesn't mean my initial post was logically incorrect. RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Typrop - 03-10-2020 (03-10-2020, 05:42 AM)Grumblesaur Wrote: You engaged my contribution by calling it cancer. I'm just throwing stones through the already-broken window. He called the concept of sanctionlancer cancerous. Your entire response to him is predicated on an attack on his character in order to invalidate his argument, which, does not fall under the "fallacy fallacy." Attacking his character, for being sanctioned several times - therefore supposedly invalidating his argument - is an ad hominem, and forms the backbone of your response to him. This is what we like to call a "non-argument." It is also very poorly thought out, given the fact that pretty much every user in this thread has been sanctioned at one point or another, barring a few select examples. Try demonstrating why simply moving bases is not preferable to creating a greater sanction-load than there already is, if you are actually trying to convince people of something, instead of arguing against people you don't like for the sake of not liking them. If you cannot take having something you say be called nonviable, regardless of syntax, then you might want to consider not "contributing" in an open forum. RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Jayce - 03-10-2020 Long Island Station will have a Rogue IFF shortly. Gonna' happen. Promise. RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Skorak - 03-10-2020 (03-10-2020, 02:30 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Perhaps if the original owners actually took the time to think about what they were doing, we wouldn't have this issue. Tough less than five minutes. RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Lucas - 03-10-2020 Or we Just delete pobs!!!! RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Thyrzul - 03-10-2020 (03-10-2020, 02:30 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Perhaps if the original owners actually took the time to think about what they were doing, we wouldn't have this issue. It's always amusing to see people going clever without checking facts first. RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - SnakThree - 03-10-2020 (03-10-2020, 02:30 AM)Victor Steiner Wrote: Perhaps if the original owners actually took the time to think about what they were doing, we wouldn't have this issue. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about as you are absolutely uninformed about situation that you are absolutely wrong about. The POB in question has changed ownership from member of 5th| to mercenaries. After the ownership changed, it was decided to kindly ask the base to be moved 5k away. This is absolutely fair and absolutely reasonable. Moving POB takes a minute or two. Not warning someone over for legit roleplay requires even less effort. In general, refusal to move POBs after there was precedence seems to be far worse than doing RP and asking someone to move POB when situation changes. RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Petitioner - 03-10-2020 just get rid of rules about bases and let them be a wild west, like they were when they were very very first implemented no more attack declarations, no more IFF restrictions, no more core restrictions, slap a pricetag on move requests, ez pz RE: Please consider moving or changing IFF of POB - Victor Steiner - 03-10-2020 Snac, if Libgov had told 5th or whoever originally built the thing to keep 5K distance, you wouldn't have this issue would you? |