![]() |
|
Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Stories and Biographies (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=56) +--- Thread: Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. (/showthread.php?tid=1926) |
Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Dab - 11-26-2006 Well I was thinking the AW would come in sort of like a protector of HF. For example, we could do a territorial war between the factions. Fighting for control of the Omegas. The AW would come in only as defenders of the HF's controlled territory. For example. Start off would be something like HF, Helghast, and AW would have Omega-41 and Omega-11 (or -5), and SCRA and sso| would have 49 and 47 (or 15). The AW would only be in Omega-41 and -11, and would not participate in any attacks on non-controlled systems. This would allow us to be their allies still without turning the tables to drastically. We might still move through the other Omegas, but we wouldn't initiate hostilities, only defend ourselves and whoever we may be escorting. During this SCRA and allies would be seen as KoS on our diplo list, but really only be KoS in the Omegas and Theta (And Vespucci). @QV: "When your dead your dead." Means that in a fight, if you die, your out of it. If the fight is taking place at the station you spawn at, you just don't undock. Only after that battle is over can you reenter a fight. Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Aeon - 11-26-2006 uhh... is that a trick question QV? cuz all it means is that when in combat, after you die, dont come back to fight for a while. yea, we're just exploring the options here people, im also down with what other people want to do too. the only reason i suggested to continue the war is because koolmo and QV want it... i dont really care either way as long as it isnt nasty. Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Malaclypse 666 - 11-26-2006 Recap: Tank Target now present. Osav present for Helghast, but abstaining. Dab present by invitation. Not voting. Gentlemen, can we keep the discussion to the motion on the table, please? There seems to be growing consensus on point one: '1 strike, out.' The Omega's were presented as site. Consensus needed. No response from Helghast on which home systems to defend. Should Dab's offer of involvement be accepted or rejected? Some progress. Healthy. Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Qunitinius~Verginix - 11-26-2006 OK sorry i just needed comformation, I thought like if ur ship blows up ur outta the war or something. Just being sure. Well im all glad we can come with an agreement. here is what i think: Helghast and HF control omega 3 7 and 11 (omega 15 is too out of the way) this shows that we have the prime pirating spots. SCRA and chosen ally get the omega 41 49 and 47 because there base is cran canaria. Omega 5 will be no mans land. Basicly we fight over these areas. Dublin can be incuded if you want, see as it is close to omega 49. Any thoughts? Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Aeon - 11-26-2006 well Dab's offer would only stand if the HF were involved, and at this point in time, it looks like Tank doesnt want to be anymore. we need to clarify whether or not the HF are going to be involved, because that changes everything. only the SCRA and Helghast would be fighting in that case, and unless both factions agreed, noone else would be involved. so we need some info here Tank, whats going on exactly? Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Malaclypse 666 - 11-26-2006 Aeon,Nov 25 2006, 10:52 PM Wrote:well Dab's offer would only stand if the HF were involved, and at this point in time, it looks like Tank doesnt want to be anymore. The Facilitator enters a motion for Aeon, to table the previous motion until such time as the actual combatants are identified. On the matter of AW: Yea or nay? On the matter of HF: Yea / nay? On the matter of Helghast v SCRA only: Yea / nay? On the matter of who even cares: Yea / nay? Votes by tomorrow AM, gentlemen. We are adjourned to the bar! Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Aeon - 11-26-2006 Malaclypse 666,Nov 25 2006, 10:41 PM Wrote:The Facilitator enters a motion for Aeon, to table the previous motion until such time as the actual combatants are identified. On the matter of AW: nay On the matter of HF: nay, if they come in, so do one of our allies. On the matter of Helghast v SCRA only: yea On the matter of who even cares: nay Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Koolmo - 11-26-2006 On the matter of AW: nay On the matter of HF: nay, unless thay want to, and then so do the SSO On the matter of Helghast v SCRA only: yea, less confusion that way, and prob less chane of degrading. On the matter of who even cares: yea, for i think that this is a good chance to get some more members for both the factions. On a side note: If this war does happen, I would request that all "allies" and other agreements of friendship be suspend throught the course of the war, to prevent degridation into another brawl. (cough Korrd + AW) Koolmo Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Malaclypse 666 - 11-26-2006 "Dis, make sure there's plenty of coffee and nosh available for the conferees, eh? It looks like we may have another long day of nit-picking ahead of us. "Oh, and squawk the other parties who haven't voted on the motion yet. We should at least get the "who's who" out of the way before we decimate these crumpets." *Done and done, Mal. Shall I update the agenda as well?* "Leave it for now. Let's leave the update until we actually have something solid to justify the effort." Helghast, HF, SCRA negotiations thread. - Qunitinius~Verginix - 11-26-2006 AW: nay HF: Yea, if they do then SSO come for SCRA Helghast vs SCRA only: NAy, we need allies Who even cares: Yea, because Koolmoo is right, we both get more memebers. |