![]() |
|
Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183) +---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389) +----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +----- Thread: Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber (/showthread.php?tid=32681) |
Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - teschy - 01-10-2010 ' Wrote:I don't see any Liberty influence what-so-ever, sorry. Hey, a sculptor starts from a piece of wood, nothing more. Give it some time, throw your ideas in. Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Irra - 01-10-2010 Wings are HUGE and WIDE! A lot.. Make central body a bit bigger but make wings smaller that thing will get shot down by snac in few seconds. Notice how Fafnir and Mjor what ever is that SHF called have really small wings smaller then Wraith.. and they are very thin But wings on this are bulky a bit too much i think. Quote:13-ARKM-N37 "Fafnir" Bomber Quote:Li-127 Liberty "Justiciar" Tactical Bomber Leave balancing to balance teams.. you suck at it:D Check ehm.. There is less hull then fafnir but more bots, less energy but higher regen.. doesnt make sense. And of It must have Fr shield just like Fafnir other way its useless. Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Bad.Wolf - 01-10-2010 more looks like a intercepter, dont scarp the model, its good, just need to be added to something else, it doesnt fit the liberty..it fits more of the civy way..the engines look close to the eagle's engines.. in away PS. good job Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - mjolnir - 01-10-2010 It doesn't resemble the other Liberty ships to me much, but that's just personal opinion. Liberty does have too many ships, if we count outside the norm which is LF, VHF, Freighter, Bomber, GB, Cruiser/Destroyer/BS then we get: Liberty +4 (Bomber - Havoc, HF, BC, BS) Bretonia +1 (HF) Kusari +1 (GB - Kusari Explorer) Rheinland +3 (LF - Tigershark, SHF, Superbomber) Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Kazinsal - 01-10-2010 Okay, I have some heads to smash... It doesn't look liberty-ish because it's, as the infocard says, developed off of the Fafnir. I agree, Liberty has a crapton of ships. Why don't we stop whining about it and build some more for the other houses? And, with the blockiness of the ship, the FL engine will smoothen it a lot. The ship's only 1100-ish polys. I don't balance ships. That's the dev team's job. Let them do it. Boss was in love with the power core, can we leave that like that pl0x? Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Guest - 01-10-2010 ' Wrote:Power regen is high, you've listed 3,000 power / second while the barghest is only 2,350 and the fafnir is only 2,735.From the looks of things, this ship is also a good deal larger than the fafnir. Thicker wings for starters. Thats why "Justiciar" is on dictionary.com and not Justicar? dictionary.com Wrote:justicar - no dictionary results dictionary.com Wrote:jus⋅ti⋅ci⋅ar ' Wrote:I don't see any Liberty influence what-so-ever, sorry. I see enough Liberty influence. Remember the basic model is the Fafnir. http://i50.tinypic.com/scs7c7.jpg Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Adam Peacecraft - 01-11-2010 Justiciar is too British then for a Liberty ship. Give the name to the Bretonians. We've got the Guardian, Defender, Avenger, Upholder... why not call it the Enforcer, or the Sentinel, or the Champion, or the Preserver, or the Vindicator? Thesauruses are useful. Unless all those names are taken. Then, not so useful. I like the ship design, though it does need more triangular geometry and less octagon, at least around the wings. I think the body can stay octagonal, since the other fighters have the same cylinder body shape. The body doesn't necessarily need to be wider, but the wings feel stubby/insufficiently wide for such a long ship. I know that doesn't really matter in space, but it's all about aesthetics. Especially since being positioned so far to the rear would screw up the center of gravity big-time irl. Not that we care about physics irl (Independence War was awesome!), but I feel I should point it out as an aesthetic suggestion all the same. The tips of the wings look really weird and non-aerodynamic. Can you change them to fins on the tips of the wings? It would really pretty those wings up a lot. Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Kazinsal - 01-11-2010 Name's been changed to Vindicator. Way more Libertonian. New pictures coming sooner or later. Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Donutman - 01-25-2010 ' Wrote:It doesn't resemble the other Liberty ships to me much, but that's just personal opinion. Corrected. Havoc is civilian. Also, I see no liberty influence in this thing, sorry. Also, you forgot the transports. Include them (With small TP and Super TP as a given) and it's Liberty +3 ( HF, BC, BS) Bretonia +2 (HF, ConTrans) Kusari +2 (GB - Kusari Explorer, ConTrans) Rheinland +3 (LF - Tigershark, SHF, Superbomber) Vindicator - Liberty Tactical Bomber - Asgardian - 01-25-2010 Although its not conventional Libertonian design... I like it:) A few jagged edges here, some cockpits there <strike>ten supernova cannons there</strike> and it'll look a bit more Libertonian. Good work though. |