![]() |
|
To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 (/showthread.php?tid=44088) |
To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Cosmos - 07-18-2010 the fact that the rule stated is complete Bull and There is likely a good reason for what the TCG did is a good start eh? So tell me Mr "Retired" man, When did you give such a damn about this place? I thought You were here for the Pewing? Guess You think you're some kind of a diplomat or something now. This thread keeps getting better and better. To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - The.Wizard - 07-18-2010 ' Wrote:To clear this up. The TCG Opened fire and destroyed Order| vessels. No warning at all. That's a one quarter of the true like everything so far....Primary pilots shoot first on TCG|Karver and damage him beyond repair...after this MrBarnes shoot them back,and that was the beginning.Before all that two Order pilots threaten to kill me evan i just log in few sec. ago in that time...All evidence of all that is happened that day is, of course available,but this is just a tip of the ice berg here...mountain of lies is coming from Order Primary fleet pilots for month now... To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Cosmos - 07-18-2010 And there it is, He even said he has evidence. So how is this situation justified when the Primary fleet, Antagonized them and shot at them first eh? To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Moreton - 07-18-2010 ' Wrote:shut it will, My wall of text is taken from the Rules that Igiss set in place, Not random ones that were invented due to constant moaning from factions.http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=21888 http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=51206 ??? To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Cond0r - 07-18-2010 ' Wrote:the fact that the rule stated is complete Bull and There is likely a good reason for what the TCG did is a good start eh?Yea, since you know that everything was "by the book" you call the rules bull and change the topic, which is typical, I might add. What does my reason for being here have anything to do with this topic? But while we're at it, since when do you make posts that don't contain ": ))))))))"? And no, I'm not a diplomat, I simply know what a FR5 is, unlike you it seems. To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - schlurbi - 07-18-2010 I believe 90% of Discovery would like see Cosmos leaving this Thread/Forum/Community. So gently GTFO and do your own Crap. To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Waratah - 07-18-2010 Ok please everyone there is no need for this. We are dealing with whats served up to us and will improvise adapt and overcome. All we ask is for our ships to be allowed to leave Minor without the gank of 4 Osiris 2 Gebs and others trying to blow us up. Where is the fairness there 0.0 We are doing as asked and at the same time not being able to do so without having to have the whole fleet chase 2 of our ships. To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Moreton - 07-18-2010 ' Wrote:And there it is, He even said he has evidence.http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=75098 *sigh* Stop making this easy, Waratah is still yet to show his evidence. To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Cond0r - 07-18-2010 No point in arguing with him Kara, he'll probably just edit his post when he sees that he was beaten with his own words, which is to a rather large extent, amusing:lol: PS: If there is counter-evidence, I'm sure someone will eventually see it. To The Admins: In Reference to the TCG Faction Right 5 - Zelot - 07-18-2010 Guys, this thread is directed at the admins, asking them to clarify why they approved a faction right 5 in this case. Thats it, no more than that. |