![]() |
|
Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +---- Forum: Faction Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=46) +----- Forum: Faction Review and Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=135) +------ Forum: Archived Feedback Threads (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=484) +------ Thread: Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread (/showthread.php?tid=54225) |
Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - Osilon - 04-02-2011 From what I can gather: Seby talked to Du Lac. Du Lac talked to Admins. ??????? Battleship. Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - SMI-Great.Fox - 04-02-2011 We are who we are... Each of us has our own statement on what the Legione is.. If you want, why not join up and see for yourself?.. And no, we did not get special treatment. It was the product of months of work, hard labor, and dealing with others who simply did not like us, and I wont name names. Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - Cat - 04-02-2011 ' Wrote:I do believe it was in their Faction Creation request post. As in it was part of their creation request and was granted as part of their becoming official.Also, since the Faction Creation Request link works no more, I think I'll need to clarify one thing: Grande Guillotine was indeed a part of that request. The story in the request told how Grande Guillotine ended up in the Brigands' hands. Also, Fox has the point. That's how I see the situation: les Damnes consist of various people, and every single character has different origin. Some may be idealistic and anti-Royalist, while others have no grudge against them. As a Brigand, I'd take the Royalists as "necessary evil" (they interfere with our affairs and are constantly hunting us; yet we still control a large part of Gallic black market). Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - Dusty Lens - 04-02-2011 So you guys have a spec ops ID on the BS? Edit: N/M... Seems something odd was going on in the thread on my end... Just saw it. @ Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - sable - 04-02-2011 This is a Feedback thread. Not a thread about my battleship. If you have questions about that, PM me, or skype me. Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - alphadog - 04-15-2011 Tonight with an encounter as IDF I noticed you're not hostile to the IMG. Seems a bit odd to me, since you pirate them whenever you have the chance. Might be better if you shoot some NPC's so it reflects your actual reputation with them? I was hoping to get some fire support from Dounby, but that didn't work out so well :$ Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - Junes - 04-15-2011 I personally apologize for that, it's because we shot BMM depots in Tau-23 for RP purposes, I even became green with =CR= on my gunboat. Sorry if it caused confusion, I'll fix that soon. Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - chopper - 05-26-2011 Quote:Exact Player/Group Name(s): Crossbones I've tried finding their technology request on my own, but I somehow failed. Can you help me? Thanks. Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - sable - 05-26-2011 http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?sh...c=84410&hl= Took me 1 minute. Legion des Damnes (+LE+) feedback thread - sadtranslation - 10-05-2011 Hello there. I love you and everything, but one of the threads I ran into persistently places one little idea that changes everything into my mind. Let me rephrase, there is something irking me. This thread (the original one and the notarized copy) seems rather unusual, not to say specific. Can you tell me about the actual context of this event? This is not a CSV provided on a system restart, right? Maybe it's a Corse character hired by Brigands who just happened to love this fine piece of ship. I don't know, but I'm sure that there is nothing questionable here; you are honest, neet and organized guys, aren't you?You hadn't specifically used it for 'spying' on OSI-, right? And you hadn't decided that a random encounter is a fine justification for using this "recording", right? Excuse me this straight approach, but it looks too much similar to something which is considered a very poor form for a reason. |