Discovery Gaming Community
A way to controll capital spammage - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: A way to controll capital spammage (/showthread.php?tid=57324)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


A way to controll capital spammage - VoluptaBox - 03-25-2011

' Wrote:The community as a whole needs to be less critical and more helpful...

Couldn't agree more. The irony is, though, that most experienced members are indeed like that, and they rarely submit a report, for example. Instead, those same "lolwhuts" (god I hate the term, but it conveys the message better than others) are rule lawyers. I've never had an experienced player yell at me about something, whereas I had tons of new players yell at me repeatadly "that is against the rules, I report". Of course, they soon found out they had no reason to report, but hey...

You see my point?:)


A way to controll capital spammage - William Frederick Cody - 03-25-2011

' Wrote:Oh hey, it's this thread again.



A way to controll capital spammage - Daedric - 03-25-2011

' Wrote:one must not be in the faction to get the ship, but the official faction decide who they will give the cruiser/battleship license to.

If this is any part of your suggestion then, no. Official factions have no right to control cap ship usage. We are not more entitled than indy players.


A way to controll capital spammage - J.Miller - 03-25-2011

' Wrote:The official factions, has for YEARS asked to be given controll. Liberty Navy, Outcasts, Corsairs, Order and lately Bretonian Armed Forces has had/have huge issues with their capitals. For some its simply unbearable to whatch these caps do as they want.

Do not agree, this is not the way to handle it. Here in this quote we see the biased opinions again. Why is the Rheinland Military not in there? Probably cause you are in the military. I don't like this. And if there is capspam, just get your bombers, problem solved. Stop Q_Qing about something that is easily fixed. And besides, what if (in a raid) only one side would bring caps, and the rest would bring snubs. Then the caps would be annihilated. You can only complain about the capspam if there are caps on your side being ganked by Caps of the other side. So just get more bombers, problem solved. Why do you think they are there in the first place.


A way to controll capital spammage - Pinko - 03-25-2011

There are more Fighters than Capital ships. Why worry?


A way to controll capital spammage - VoluptaBox - 03-25-2011

' Wrote:Do not agree, this is not the way to handle it. Here in this quote we see the biased opinions again. Why is the Rheinland Military not in there? Probably cause you are in the military. I don't like this. And if there is capspam, just get your bombers, problem solved. Stop Q_Qing about something that is easily fixed. And besides, what if (in a raid) only one side would bring caps, and the rest would bring snubs. Then the caps would be annihilated. You can only complain about the capspam if there are caps on your side being ganked by Caps of the other side. So just get more bombers, problem solved. Why do you think they are there in the first place.

Saying "grab bombers and deal with it" it's just plainly dumb. It's like saying "My car is leaking fuel. No problem, just keep re-filling it when it's empty 8-|".

Now, again, this is a problem, but the solution ain't in the OP, imo. No reason to stop looking tho;)


A way to controll capital spammage - Silver.2 - 03-25-2011

Yes.

Absolutely.

You have my 100% support on this, Prysin. It's absolutely brilliant.


A way to controll capital spammage - Aphil - 03-25-2011

Personally, I think this is a good idea. Whether or not it's actually implemented is another thing.

That said, I think very few people would disagree when I say that it's a good thing to stop the "no enlish (((" people from obtaining Large Ships. Will we probably drive some of them off? Yes. Is that really such a bad thing? I'll leave that up to you.

Obviously, as some have said, there will be bias. That is fact. No matter what we do, it will be there. But should we kill off an idea just because of a POSSIBILITY? Nah. It's like banning Vaccines because there's a POSSIBILITY that it'll kill someone. It's down-right silly.

If anything, we should at least give this a try via a test period of some sort.



A way to controll capital spammage - Pinko - 03-25-2011

I wish I'd understand all of you people and your problems with capital ships. Because, honestly, I have more issues with silly fighters and bombers, they are more common and are more prone to travelling in packs. If Capital ships wouldn't exist, you guys would attempt to restrict traders so powertraders would be forced to roleplay. Hmm, maybe I am being rude...


A way to controll capital spammage - Vito - 03-25-2011

inb4ryoken

' Wrote:- Gives official faction more control and will decrease the amount of so called "lolcaps".

I get wet only by thinking about that. Yes, please, make the lolcaps go away