![]() |
|
Technology is bad - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: The Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Flood (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Thread: Technology is bad (/showthread.php?tid=84891) |
Technology is bad - Mímir - 08-02-2012 So by that logic, no drugs should be restricted because you can get them anyways? Mind you, that train of thought have even more dramatic consequences. EDIT: More than 200 live rounds was fired from that particular carbine. Technology is bad - Dubstep - 08-02-2012 More importantly, why is this in flood? Technology is bad - Huhuh - 08-02-2012 ' Wrote:So by that logic, no drugs should be restricted because you can get them anyways? And how did you get that from what I said? I didn't say anything about restriction, I just said it is easy enough to get a weapon without the need for a printer. Technology is bad - Mímir - 08-02-2012 Ok, sorry I thought it was an argument in the discussion rather than just a statement. It's in flood because flood is good for randomness and discussions totally unrelated to Disco and gaming. Technology is bad - Junes - 08-02-2012 Mimir, read "The Singularity Is Near" by Ray Kurzweil and you'll understand why such things are inevitable. Technology is bad - Craig Ferguson - 08-03-2012 ' Wrote:It's in flood because flood is good for randomness and discussions totally unrelated to Disco and gaming.Actually that's what this section is for, but whatever, man. Mind if I make myself at home here and toss a few unrelated gifs about? Well of course you don't, it's Flood. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Carry on, gun-control experts. Technology is bad - Loken - 08-03-2012 ![]() Technology is bad - fencore - 08-03-2012 You spelled my name wrong. Technology is bad - Error - 08-03-2012 ' Wrote:So by that logic, no drugs should be restricted because you can get them anyways?That reminds me of an article I read in New Scientist recently... http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2142...he-digital.html <strike>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2170...3d-printer.html</strike> Food for thought, I suppose. EDIT: Sorry, forgot that I was logged in and that the full version of the article isn't readable unless you're a subscriber - strikethrough applied. There's plenty of other reading material on the subject accessible through Google, for those who are interested, including parts of the original research paper. Technology is bad - Huhuh - 08-03-2012 ' Wrote:Carry on, gun-control experts. You're too late. |