' Wrote:because there was lack of communication between freeport 9 and the corsairs in the first place. i take it this was the starting spark for this whole conflict.

then again, i could be wrong.

' Wrote:Yes, let us Corsairs deal with the Omicroners. We have seen how well that has gone.

On the other hand, making deals of any kind with the OSI and the TAZ has proven to be rather beneficial, and not only for us. Then we see you folks putting bounty on other Zoners and silencing the fellas who do not agree with your ways it's no surprise the talk of deals has gone so "wonderfully well." Incoming excuse that Mike Rotch is not part of the Omicroners in 3... 2... 1...

I wonder why you are emphasising so much on making deals with the Omicroners but not only emphasising on the Omicroners in particular but also to ignore the other groups, granted you are located at the Freeport where most of the conflict is, amusingly the group is the least communicative of all the three Zoner groups the Corsairs have talked to.

' Wrote:I agree with that.
Mike Rotch put the bounty on the Omicroners.

If you cannot distinguish between characters, oh wait, what am I saying, you cannot. Ergh.

Also, Omicroners are in negotiations.

However, as everyone can see by your posts, your tin foil hat is melting.

' Wrote:Mike Rotch put a bounty on Gabriel Caudill.

Gabriel Caudill is the leader of the OSI.

The words uttered in the open bounty message was included: "We will not forgive. We will not forget. We are real Zoners."

In previous transmissions the same words have been said, on behalf of the Omicroners. That a character can make a conclusion based on that is entirely natural. It is unfortunately you who can't distinguish between characters and players.

I'm already aware that the Omicroners are in negotiations.

' Wrote:Link?

Gabriel Caudill sabotaged the talks on Freeport 9, putting FP9 into a worse situation. I think I already explained this to an Administrator, but no doubt the Hideki police will solve it all. Elementarily, no doubt.:lol:

But, it was more of an anonymous reference for humour, as well as a slight jab at the Administration's no anonymous bounties rule.

If you are aware of negotiations, then STFU.

' Wrote:I'm not going to search through the five hundred Zoner threads to find you those words. But rest assured, they were said, I distinctively recall that saying.

"Hideki police", I mean here you are trying to call me out for some paranoid tin-foil guy and you are going here making these assumptions that I'm having a group of people investigating all of your moves. You are mistaken my level of involvement. My level of involvement includes basically, me getting on my Solarizer and claiming eight blue messages. Yes, you can quote me on that any day you want.

I don't really care if it was made as any reference at all, my character made a conclusion. We were talking about distinguishing characters from players right?

Talk of being civil? What is this, telling me to STFU, it includes a swear word doesn't it? No I don't feel insulted, you can't insult me. But, I'm just pointing how every statement you make towards me, just keep backlashing towards yourself. Love it pal.

' Wrote:So in other words, you are lying? Cool beans.

No, I mean you are trying to police my character's actions. Something which ironically, you seem to be against when it comes to your characters. Of course, the word hypocrite does come to mind.

Yes, brilliant tale about PVP, chap.

No, you made a conclusion. Your character is not arguing with mine here.:lol:(Distinguishing failure much?)

Wrong thread. Go back and reply to the right one.:lol:

Also, you sound like you are re-assuring yourself that you are not being insulted. Keep doing so. I think you need to.

' Wrote:I ain't lying. I heard the words, but I might have mistaken the source. Might have been from a feedback thread or a discussion thread rather than an actual communications thread. If this is the case, my character can't draw that conclusion and I will change it immediately. I was under the assumption it was since the text itself was of a Role-Play nature. I don't really see people would write like that in an OORP thread.

I'm not trying to police your character's actions, it seems that if my character is against your interest, this is somewhat the case. I'm sorry, but that's called actions and consequences, the foundations of real-time Role-Play.

See first paragraph for your attempt to twist my words about making conclusions.

I'm not reassuring myself mate, I was making it clear between calling out on your statements and it being mistaken for being insulted. But here we go with the tin-foil talks again. Backlash after backlash.

' Wrote:So in other words, you did a search using the forum functions, and your foundation crumbled right?:lol:

Classic really.

Yes, yes. Not policing police.

Amazing anecdote, amigo.

Here you go, re-assuring yourself again. Oh well, I did say you needed it.

' Wrote:Yeah, I just went and searched now to make sure. Since I began doubting the source. It doesn't mean anything more than me double-checking.

About the reassuring part. It's like me making a statement, you replying to it. Then me telling the exact same statement again, so you reply to it in the same nature. And then I confirm I predicted your reaction right? What a nice rhetorical trick you have learned, I must congratulate you.

' Wrote:Foundation crumbled, as I said.

Yes, well, repetition works for teaching low-end beings right? (Not related to this thread or it's participants, just something I learned along the way of life.)

' Wrote:Of course, the word hypocrite does come to mind.