+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Player Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=244)
+---- Forum: Official Faction Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=245)
+----- Forum: Official Faction Creation Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=134)
+------ Forum: Approved Faction Creation Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=136)
+------ Thread: Reaver Mercenary Co. (/showthread.php?tid=55893)
Reaver Mercenary Co. - fencore - 06-17-2011
' Wrote:Please pick just one.. jeez. It shouldn't take this long to get one simple straight answer.The simple answer is 'both'. Roleplay and pew-pew don't have to be mutually exclusive.
And hey, we like to know the people we're shooting. It even gives you the opportunity to offer us more than we're being offered, because if you offer us more than we're being offered already, then your offer will most likely keep you alive a little longer.
Savvy?
Reaver Mercenary Co. - BaconSoda - 06-17-2011
Why do we only have to do one?
If I can assume you're the Crossbones folks, you'll notice that at first, Amethyst and Pumpernickel did just sit and chat. It was a 2v1 and that was really nice. Good odds. I would never complain in those odds. Then we decided "Hey, this guy likes to really dodge. This money will be easier. Lets all ignore him for a little bit" and we collected. It was 4v4. Can't get much better odds than those. Completely even. Is there anything wrong with doing both of those things?
I think I answered your question now.
Reaver Mercenary Co. - casero - 06-17-2011
' Wrote:I didn't know that saying we were going to collect didn't answer whether or not we were collecting.
Sorry, had to:)
Reaver Mercenary Co. - Stygian - 06-17-2011
Your question is a bit confusing. Unless you elaborate a little more on the exact issue you have it will be hard to give you a good answer.
But if you really want a short answer its gonna have to be "both".
Reaver Mercenary Co. - Santa-Clause - 06-17-2011
To Collect.
Reaver Mercenary Co. - Death.RunningVerminator - 06-17-2011
' Wrote:To Collect.Thank you, Santa.
As for the rest.. *shakes head in confusion*
Geez.. One question and you guys get all weird on me.. It's like you want to be disliked or something. Not saying i dislike you guys though. Gheis you're awesome, kalliste eh dunno 'bout you weird chick, baconsoda meh too up-tight.
Reaver Mercenary Co. - Zapp - 06-17-2011
Who the hell ever said Kalliste was a chick?
Reaver Mercenary Co. - Hone - 06-17-2011
as far as I can see they're there to do both, how is that hard to understand?
What I really like about the Reavers is their devotion to the money, and not caring about allies.
Although I was less than impressed when one decided to attack my BPA saying "Better portect bluie" refering to the nomad BS I was attempting to contain. As far as I know nomads dont hire mercs - I know that theres a bounty on BPA, which is why he attacked, but saying hes protecting a nomad?
Reaver Mercenary Co. - Enojado - 06-17-2011
' Wrote:Thank you, Santa.
As for the rest.. *shakes head in confusion*
Geez.. One question and you guys get all weird on me.. It's like you want to be disliked or something. Not saying i dislike you guys though. Gheis you're awesome, kalliste eh dunno 'bout you weird chick, baconsoda meh too up-tight.
![[Image: mzl.gwwlvipg.320x480-75.jpg]](http://a4.mzstatic.com/us/r1000/006/Purple/c3/3c/0a/mzl.gwwlvipg.320x480-75.jpg)
No more silly questions or comments about who you do or do not like please. This is a serious faction request/feedback thread.
Reaver Mercenary Co. - Enoch - 06-17-2011
' Wrote:I'll have to talk to Zel before i start making trouble with the Gaians, but i am pretty sure them hiring you violates bounty board guidelines. er for them, not you.Care to elaborate or are you just in the regular mud-throwing mood ?