+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: GMG bomber ( replace ) (/showthread.php?tid=11171)
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Jamez - 08-11-2008
That GMG HF looks fantastic, Jinx, you are awesome.
ANOTHER 100 COOL POINTS.
These ships better get added.
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Jinx - 08-11-2008
on Dustys request - here is the direct size comparison to the rheinland bomber ( 58k power )
![[Image: ms3d2008-08-1122-42-34-99.jpg]](http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc79/JinxTT/ms3d2008-08-1122-42-34-99.jpg)
![[Image: ms3d2008-08-1122-42-14-71.jpg]](http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc79/JinxTT/ms3d2008-08-1122-42-14-71.jpg)
![[Image: ms3d2008-08-1122-42-12-47.jpg]](http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc79/JinxTT/ms3d2008-08-1122-42-12-47.jpg)
( no comments about those )
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Dusty Lens - 08-11-2008
As to the HF...
1) I feel that the main body should more closely emulate that of the bomber, as though they're more or less the same ship (due to you nailing the bomber).
2) The hoop should go, it feels a little overdone on the slim frame of the HF, furthermore it's not really doing much saving that little torp slot at the bottom.
3) Replace the Kusarian pods/wings with your new bomber pods. It'll keep the same profile as your HF, but have a feel much closer to the bomber in style. Just make sure they stay at the same 45 degree angle.
If you did that, I reckon you could put the torp slot betwixt the oversized pods!
The ship would be the same general shape, but I feel that it would retain a lot more of the bomber's feel, which I really like for the newly established GMG look!
*grins and eyeballs the stinger*
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Jinx - 08-11-2008
alright - gonne modify it that way. .... after i done some of Xings ships. ( hardpointing )
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Dusty Lens - 08-11-2008
No stress, bomber and ship size comparisons for what they pack always blow me away, on that note.
GMG bomber ( replace ) - mjolnir - 08-11-2008
As I posted somewhere else I consider both the RH bomber and Taiidan too good now.
Taiidan also turns as good as Catamarans in one axis...
That's why both would need some changing... preferably bats/bots and armor reduction. As well as fixing Taiidans turning
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Blodo - 08-11-2008
As an addition to Dusty's suggestion on the HF: It should definitely get a quattro of sleek wings behind the bomber pods though, to make it look faster and a bit more distinct from the bomber.
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Cawdor - 08-12-2008
since we are talking about the GMG ship line here:
This is the only shipline in the entire game that can actually, legally look "cool" (note: not FLish). With some smoth wings and Aerodynamic Designs. And I am not talking about compromises like the Stinger. I am talking about real plane-type-designs, since the GMG is almost only around in Nebulae.
my 2 cents.
Edit: needless to say that I am oposed to the current design of the bomber as it is some strange falcata-wrath-taiidan mix in a way. you may throw rocks at me if ya want but thats how I feel about it.
GMG bomber ( replace ) - kingvaillant - 08-12-2008
Wow. Just wow. and yes, follow Dusty suggestions, leave have a look:)
GMG bomber ( replace ) - Haphestus - 08-16-2008
amazing, truly amazing