![]() |
|
Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships (/showthread.php?tid=20931) |
Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - reavengitair - 05-26-2009 Ok... That kinda settles it. But we could always say that they... I dunno... Miraculously survived? Made a fleet of adv trains and flew to sirius? Anyway, the only reason I like making up random ideas for sleeper ships is that i'd like at least one more house. Dunno why. Just think that we need one. Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - tyro - 05-26-2009 I missed this news, or I forgot about it. Who are the gallics then? Someone had to repair this ship. I only hope it was not Coalition. If they were, let us begin to build new sleppers. Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - Klaw117 - 05-26-2009 I haven't had the time to read the Gallic news yet... Ok, so then all this means is that the Italians left on the Hispania and the Australians left on the Bretonia. The French were left to fend for themselves which is why they hate the other houses right now. Am I on the right track here Igiss? If so, can we please rename some of the Outcast bases? Some of them (like Bastia and Corsica) have French names, which doesn't sound right. Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - Jonathan_Archer_nx01 - 05-26-2009 ' Wrote:So it wasn't because the French were bad drivers?WHUT? ![]() ![]()
Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - Rommie - 05-27-2009 ' Wrote:Guys, do you ever read our in-game news?I didn't make this up, if that's what you mean Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - JakeSG - 05-27-2009 Might have been stated before, but the last Sleeper was not the 'Australia', it was the 'Oceania', meaning New Guinea, New Zealand, Australia and possibly some parts of southern Asia (Malaysia, Indonesia etc). And about the wrong direction thing, it was intentional, we swear! We were just holding the line so you lot could escape! >.> Truth is, Commie scum blew us up while we were launching or some such. Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - Colonel Z.e.r.o. - 05-28-2009 ' Wrote:So it wasn't because the French were bad drivers?If that were true Kusari would've been arguing in the middle of noware right along with them . *wink* Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - reavengitair - 05-28-2009 ............. Such racism. But yea. If sleeper ships could me made so easily, we might as well make a sleeper ship for disco. Massive ship, millions of hull, no guns, no shields, and a damn lot of cargo space. With a impulse speed of 5, and a thrust speed of 10... Yea.. Endless possibilities. Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - joshua_cox - 05-28-2009 I think the Sleeper ship would be a good idea, actually. For RP purposes, it could be used to relocate a base or some such. Other than that, it would be very handy for traders. Also, are you sure it had no guns? When I watched the Freelancer intro it looked as if the Sleeper Ships were armed, which allowed them to punch through the Coalition Blockade. Damn commies though. I'd rather Oceania launched in the wrong direction then fell to the commie scum! (Just so you know, I am VERY passionate about the subject of communism. Stupid, I know, but I'd rather not get into an argument over it, because I'd say things I'd regret, and yeah.) Allright, the 8 Sleeper ships - reavengitair - 05-28-2009 Nah I don't think they were armed. They were kinda blockade runners therefore they wouldn't need weapons. Anyway the intro kinda dictates that they broke free of the blockade in a matter of seconds (yea a little exaggerated, but it wouldn't take longer than an hour to break the blockade). But killing something in a sleeper ship would be like killing a battleship in a transport. In anycase, i doubt they would put in a large powercore to deal with weapons - they were concentrating on cargo space to hold people and supplies. |