+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) (/showthread.php?tid=68403)
Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - Stoat - 03-01-2012
If there's anything you'd like to arrange with my friends and I, just chuck me a line..........
RE: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - jammi - 05-15-2015
Dear god it makes me sad that this was wasted.
RE: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - SnakeLancerHaven - 05-15-2015
Well 2011 o_O
RE: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - Wesker - 05-15-2015
I just read the beginning line and stopped.
Unless of course bowex owns the nom hive now.
RE: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - jammi - 05-15-2015
(05-15-2015, 02:59 PM)Punisher5431 Wrote: I just read the beginning line and stopped.
Unless of course bowex owns the nom hive now.
Technically it's still our guard system. Practically though, I suspect all guard system claims have been voided. If they haven't, then by the rules we still own it.
This came up in discussion in the Bowex chat, so I thought I'd show some the folks some ancient history. What do you guys think of this? The core idea of using an autoupdater to simulate progressive exploration is still viable, y'know. Maybe not in Chester, but in general.
RE: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - Miaou - 05-15-2015
Good grave digging.
RE: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - Wesker - 05-15-2015
(05-15-2015, 03:08 PM)jammi Wrote:(05-15-2015, 02:59 PM)Punisher5431 Wrote: I just read the beginning line and stopped.
Unless of course bowex owns the nom hive now.
Technically it's still our guard system. Practically though, I suspect all guard system claims have been voided. If they haven't, then by the rules we still own it.
This came up in discussion in the Bowex chat, so I thought I'd show some the folks some ancient history. What do you guys think of this? The core idea of using an autoupdater to simulate progressive exploration is still viable, y'know. Maybe not in Chester, but in general.
Chester should be more BAF gaurd system, or Newcastle given the nomtech that BAF could easily claim, or has already, bowex should have manchester, gateway should have NL. Imo I don't see why bowex would own nom tech, Ik they supply the BAF but BAF should more than less be the military and keep that to themselves.
RE: Proposed Chester Developments (.86 and beyond) - Cashew - 05-15-2015
*Checks date of OP* Hmph. Make a new thread to discuss.