![]() |
|
New ship idea: class transport - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183) +---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389) +----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +----- Thread: New ship idea: class transport (/showthread.php?tid=103341) |
RE: New ship idea: class transport - Kazinsal - 08-15-2013 (08-15-2013, 06:22 AM)Hone Wrote:(08-15-2013, 05:56 AM)Kazinsal Wrote:(08-15-2013, 05:52 AM)discomelonmk2 Wrote: The spatial, firefly, kujira are all imports and a lot of ships I see look like stuff out of Babylon 5 and a few other series I watch. Do you SEE a Spyglass model anywhere in the Discovery files? RE: New ship idea: class transport - discomelonmk2 - 08-15-2013 Ummm... I've never been interested in the spyglass but yes there is the spyglass on the wiki. RE: New ship idea: class transport - Hone - 08-15-2013 So your RE-SRP request didnt go then?I seem to remember you posting something about that? RE: New ship idea: class transport - Kazinsal - 08-15-2013 That's not an answer to my question. In fact, that's a totally unrelated question (the answer to which is we haven't actually done the SRP yet because it's not paramount to our existence). I wasn't aware that the Metropolis implied being an import. Please, O wise and brilliant one who determines whose RP is valid and whose isn't, elaborate. RE: New ship idea: class transport - discomelonmk2 - 08-15-2013 I guess not huh. Weird that it hasn't been removed yet from the wiki RE: New ship idea: class transport - Altejago - 08-15-2013 Or simply wasn't updated when Spyglass became Arbiter. Either way, the Wiki is exactly that; Wiki. If you base your arguments on that, then you're doomed to look like an idiot. Quote:Never argue with an idiot. It will bring you down to their level where upon they're more experienced. RE: New ship idea: class transport - Hone - 08-15-2013 (08-15-2013, 06:31 AM)Kazinsal Wrote: That's not an answer to my question. In fact, that's a totally unrelated question (the answer to which is we haven't actually done the SRP yet because it's not paramount to our existence). What? I asked you what happened to your SRPd Spyglass which I believe was called the Metropolis, and an import Thought it might have been updated to Arbiter when Spyglass was removed. I have no idea what you're talking about? RE: New ship idea: class transport - Kazinsal - 08-15-2013 The Raiders SRPs were removed when the original faction left and Switchback took over. I'm surprised you don't vividly remember him whining about that every ten minutes. Every Spyglass was updated to an Arbiter in 4.86. The Arbiter uses the old Spyglass file names and entries. RE: New ship idea: class transport - Echo 7-7 - 08-15-2013 (08-15-2013, 06:23 AM)Cris Wrote: This thread is going nowhere. The Development Team's current policy on ship submissions includes the following points:
Ship Submissions are closed for Mod version 4.87, and will re-open once we are into the v4.88 development cycle. You may still post models to discuss feasibility for inclusion in the mod and receive feedback on ship designs. The model in the original post would be disqualified for the following criteria: - It is drawn from an existing non-Freelancer setting. - The model is not of sufficient quality. - The model's design does not follow the aesthetics of any existing ship manufacturer in the mod lore. RE: New ship idea: class transport - Scumbag - 08-15-2013 If you want to import things for your own server or smth like that import these: ![]() With usable battleblades like in the picture, and ![]() I'll join your server i promise. |