+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Rule Inconsistencies? (/showthread.php?tid=10744)
Rule Inconsistencies? - Akumabito - 07-31-2008
No one has to prove to obvious, it's obvious that sanctions are not done in a fair, consistent manner.
Your the one defending it, right?
Rule Inconsistencies? - Reverend Del - 07-31-2008
Akumabito, back up your claims of Admin corruption with evidence and I will ensure it is acted upon. One of the rules of being an Admin on this server is that we practice total impartiality towards anyone and anything, so if there is favouritism it is against our own code of conduct. Ergo it is imperative you provide evidence for these claims so they can be investigated to their fullest extent. If you cannot provide this evidence, lord knows I've been hunting for the "Admin/Faction Collusion forum" since I got this position, I'd highly recommend you go and play the game.
Rule Inconsistencies? - Akumabito - 07-31-2008
' Wrote:Akumabito, back up your claims of Admin corruption with evidence and I will ensure it is acted upon.
PM sent
Rule Inconsistencies? - Dusty Lens - 07-31-2008
' Wrote:No one has to prove to obvious, it's obvious that sanctions are not done in a fair, consistent manner.
Your the one defending it, right?
Wait a moment!
' Wrote:I'll be the first to admit most sanctions are straightforward, cussing, modding, etc...
It's that 5% or so that aren't straightforward where the biases are allowed, where the deck is stacked depending on who you are rather than the rules and the evidence.
So 95% of sanctions -are- awesome, unless you've jumped your own ship again, but you have issue with the last 5%; those 5% illustrating a tangled web of favoritism and deliberate corruption on the side of the admin team to make the 'factions' uh, happy I guess.
I would contest that sanctions are done in an exceptionally fair and balanced manner.
I wish I could find the blasted thing, but there's a good example of Korrd doing an about face a bad sanction that he was called out on.
*thinks* I believe the only sanction that I believe was a fully bad call involved the Tigershark incident of note and legend. That was a bit out of left field and done in poor form.
Rule Inconsistencies? - sovereign - 07-31-2008
' Wrote:I wish I could find the blasted thing, but there's a good example of Korrd doing an about face a bad sanction that he was called out on.
You're welcome.
Oh wait, I'm just one of those faction pawns for their evil schemes. I'm so terribly wicked in my ruthless oppression of indies I even work for the Angels! We took the time to factionize helping people, how much worse does it get? The horror, the horror!
Rule Inconsistencies? - Dusty Lens - 07-31-2008
' Wrote:'m so terribly wicked in my ruthless oppression of indies I even work for the Angels! We took the time to factionize helping people, how much worse does it get? The horror, the horror!
We only help players in factions. Remember that.
Thanks Sov!