+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Developers Forum (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=183)
+---- Forum: Discovery Unofficial Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=389)
+----- Forum: Discovery Mod Content Submissions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=33)
+----- Thread: CORE Dreadnought (/showthread.php?tid=135571)
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Cælumaresh - 02-02-2016
(02-02-2016, 05:15 PM)Unlucky_Soul Wrote:(02-01-2016, 10:35 PM)Sturmwind Wrote: Both plz
(02-02-2016, 01:15 AM)Lambda Wrote: Both please *-*
Alas we cannot have both in the CORE, but i can recycle and tweak the other one i.e the one which gets less votes (which looks like the first one currently) to another faction.
You could retexture it and submit it for the Civilian Carrier for example
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Epo - 02-02-2016
(02-02-2016, 08:23 PM)Caelumaresh Wrote:(02-02-2016, 05:15 PM)Unlucky_Soul Wrote:(02-01-2016, 10:35 PM)Sturmwind Wrote: Both plz
(02-02-2016, 01:15 AM)Lambda Wrote: Both please *-*
Alas we cannot have both in the CORE, but i can recycle and tweak the other one i.e the one which gets less votes (which looks like the first one currently) to another faction.
You could retexture it and submit it for the Civilian Carrier for example
Yeah, pretty good replacement for bustard
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Scumbag - 02-02-2016
First one has a better design, lore wise, it's more freelancer like, but the engine ruined it. too bulky. Still had my vote.
RE: CORE Dreadnought - sasapinjic - 02-03-2016
(02-02-2016, 08:25 PM)Epo Wrote:^ i agree , fantastic idea !(02-02-2016, 08:23 PM)Caelumaresh Wrote:(02-02-2016, 05:15 PM)Unlucky_Soul Wrote:(02-01-2016, 10:35 PM)Sturmwind Wrote: Both plz
(02-02-2016, 01:15 AM)Lambda Wrote: Both please *-*
Alas we cannot have both in the CORE, but i can recycle and tweak the other one i.e the one which gets less votes (which looks like the first one currently) to another faction.
You could retexture it and submit it for the Civilian Carrier for example
Yeah, pretty good replacement for bustard
![[Image: thumbsup.gif]](http://discoverygc.com/forums/images/icons/thumbsup.gif){kind=icon}
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Unlucky_Soul - 02-06-2016
(02-03-2016, 10:42 AM)sasapinjic Wrote:(02-02-2016, 08:25 PM)Epo Wrote:^ i agree , fantastic idea !(02-02-2016, 08:23 PM)Caelumaresh Wrote:(02-02-2016, 05:15 PM)Unlucky_Soul Wrote:(02-01-2016, 10:35 PM)Sturmwind Wrote: Both plz
(02-02-2016, 01:15 AM)Lambda Wrote: Both please *-*
Alas we cannot have both in the CORE, but i can recycle and tweak the other one i.e the one which gets less votes (which looks like the first one currently) to another faction.
You could retexture it and submit it for the Civilian Carrier for example
Yeah, pretty good replacement for bustard
Well for it to be a replacement for the Bustard, i will need to remove the FG and retexture it
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Unlucky_Soul - 02-07-2016
ok the poll has ended. looks like the second one is the favorite.
Things to do to the second model
1)remove back extension
2)remove FWG
3)replace windows with another texture
i will wait for another 3 days for more inputs to be given.
once these are done, i will submit it
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Thunderer - 02-07-2016
Don't forget the black textures of the back like the Mako has!
Also, I can't see anything wrong with the windows. They look nice to me.
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Lythrilux - 02-07-2016
Keep the FWG.
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Connor - 02-07-2016
Nah remove it (:
But do Core really need a new cap? I really don't think they do :/
RE: CORE Dreadnought - Swallow - 04-02-2016
Any progress so far?