Discovery Gaming Community
Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Thread: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate (/showthread.php?tid=155199)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Erzie - 11-07-2017

Again, this thread is about JD and cloaks, not the Geb.


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - nOmnomnOm - 11-07-2017

1) you brought it up
2) the context is using a JD and cloak in a Geb

Don't run away

Most important factions have carriers. You are removing it from the order? Did the Order| approve?


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Jayce - 11-07-2017

The Order does not need to approve. Factions do not need to be consulted before changes are made to their shiplines.

Also, the Order are not important.


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Goliath - 11-07-2017

(11-07-2017, 08:59 PM)Jayce Wrote: The Order does not need to approve. Factions do not need to be consulted before changes are made to their shiplines.

I think it would be logical to.


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Jayce - 11-07-2017

(11-07-2017, 09:01 PM)Sharky!!! Wrote:
(11-07-2017, 08:59 PM)Jayce Wrote: The Order does not need to approve. Factions do not need to be consulted before changes are made to their shiplines.

I think it would be logical to.

It's a balance change. Devs do not consult factions about ship balance, only about changes that would directly affect their roleplay ability. I.e. IFF and ID changes.


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - nOmnomnOm - 11-07-2017

(11-07-2017, 08:59 PM)Jayce Wrote: The Order does not need to approve. Factions do not need to be consulted before changes are made to their shiplines.

Also, the Order are not important.

I call bias since they are one of the main factions from vanilla.


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Jayce - 11-07-2017

So are the Bundschuh. So are the LSF. So are the LN, LPI, RM, KNF...


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Goliath - 11-07-2017

(11-07-2017, 09:03 PM)Jayce Wrote:
(11-07-2017, 09:01 PM)Sharky!!! Wrote:
(11-07-2017, 08:59 PM)Jayce Wrote: The Order does not need to approve. Factions do not need to be consulted before changes are made to their shiplines.

I think it would be logical to.

It's a balance change. Devs do not consult factions about ship balance, only about changes that would directly affect their roleplay ability. I.e. IFF and ID changes.

And a change from Geb (Carrier) to Geb(BattleCrusier) would affect them. Order needs mobile carriers in distant places of Sirius and so on. (Inrp)


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - Jayce - 11-07-2017

(11-07-2017, 09:05 PM)Sharky!!! Wrote:
(11-07-2017, 09:03 PM)Jayce Wrote:
(11-07-2017, 09:01 PM)Sharky!!! Wrote:
(11-07-2017, 08:59 PM)Jayce Wrote: The Order does not need to approve. Factions do not need to be consulted before changes are made to their shiplines.

I think it would be logical to.

It's a balance change. Devs do not consult factions about ship balance, only about changes that would directly affect their roleplay ability. I.e. IFF and ID changes.

And a change from Geb (Carrier) to Geb(BattleCrusier) would affect them. Order needs mobile carriers in distant places of Sirius and so on. (Inrp)

Bustard.

In addition, you can roleplay your ship as a carrier without it being a carrier. I do it with my LABC, Mako and Bullhead.


RE: Cloak and Jumpdrive debate - "Jade Fire" - 11-07-2017

(11-07-2017, 08:58 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: 1) you brought it up
2) the context is using a JD and cloak in a Geb

Don't run away

Most important factions have carriers. You are removing it from the order? Did the Order| approve?

nOm, the Order| HC wanted this and have been in contact with devs for months, even planning to get a new module for it as well. Order| were heavily aware of this, as they asked for it