+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Community Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=627)
+--- Thread: Development Discussion: Gallia (/showthread.php?tid=185261)
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Redcroft - 03-16-2022
Well yea the system realy do not has a focus point! why dont you move Quillain to C-5 and Nimes and Hossegor in its orbit! Two tradelanes connect it with JG's ect ect.
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Groshyr - 03-16-2022
I like the Quillan-Nimes-Hossegor idea, will make a note about it, also received this in my Discord PM:
Quote:Introduce to Languedoc ship graveyard:
- unique mining zone
- scenery - many damaged/destroyed Kusari and Gallia ships
- generic scrap as it is for primary mining
- Certain gallic corps (like, GMS) and Ku corps (Kishiro, Samura) + Junkers when mining on specific vessels with mining equipment (tbd) can have a chance (1-2%) to mine a unique equipment such as:
a) snub codename
b) unique thruster (colour)
c) unique engine (cosmetics)
d) etc (tbd)
This measure is supposed to make Languedoc which is a Gallic borderworld a local activity cluster wherein miners will mine not only for profit but also for some unique loot. Miners attract pirates, pirates attract navy. Ga/Ku corps (plus, possibly ALG under licence) can also have rivalry. Drop is not supposed to be OP
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Redcroft - 03-16-2022
(03-16-2022, 10:37 AM)Groshyr Wrote: I like the Quillan-Nimes-Hossegor idea, will make a note about it, also received this in my Discord PM:
Quote:Introduce to Languedoc ship graveyard:
- unique mining zone
- scenery - many damaged/destroyed Kusari and Gallia ships
- generic scrap as it is for primary mining
- Certain gallic corps (like, GMS) and Ku corps (Kishiro, Samura) + Junkers when mining on specific vessels with mining equipment (tbd) can have a chance (1-2%) to mine a unique equipment such as:
a) snub codename
b) unique thruster (colour)
c) unique engine (cosmetics)
d) etc (tbd)
This measure is supposed to make Languedoc which is a Gallic borderworld a local activity cluster wherein miners will mine not only for profit but also for some unique loot. Miners attract pirates, pirates attract navy. Ga/Ku corps (plus, possibly ALG under licence) can also have rivalry. Drop is not supposed to be OP
Hah yea kusari in gallic space.. exchange kusari for img then its ok.
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Lemon - 03-16-2022
Rheinland and Gallia Zurich+Cologne Zoi extensions have been denied by admins, they are the only two houses without overlapping Zoi or attack lines systems in the game.
Quote:Your Request has been denied.
Cologne/Zurich are not an exception but more then norm.
Nevertheless, [GN] Maquis and Unioners have been working on action in Zurich and it has taken place/is being developed, admins slowed us down sadly, I don't think it's a systems issue, action would be helped if more than Unioners/Hessians had overlapping Zois however - an admin question.
The missions are very good there already, so is the bottleneck for trade, not much systems can add imo.
We can try to go the perk way for Zois and push the changes that way - the region does have a lot of potential as "alternative" on again off again action area.
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Shinju - 03-16-2022
(03-16-2022, 10:46 AM)Redcroft Wrote: Hah yea kusari in gallic space.. exchange kusari for img then its ok.
Except that IMG doesn't specialise in scrap mining, while in the field are KNF ships which should be salvaged by Kusari corps. There is a treaty or something about that
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Groshyr - 03-16-2022
Indeed, there is the Treaty of Rishiri, GalGov also offered Kusari to mutually revoke ban of each other's corps but they denied the proposal (see this)
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Redcroft - 03-16-2022
Dont know if this idea is good r bad but how about instead of many fields and nebulas make just two large ones?
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Groshyr - 03-16-2022
You mean, nebula on east-north and nebula on west-south, with system laying between them?
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Lemon - 03-16-2022
A suggestion from Rheinland - makes sense to me actually
RE: Gallic Development - Information & Feedback - Groshyr - 03-16-2022
I'm not an admin to answer the above but I can imagine how it would look, especially if you make system to hold wild, corse black market, freeport and a navy/military battlecruiser guarding each gate, although it probably would be a heavy retcon for the location (not like I care much about this to happen, just saying), yet the topic I rose was and is LANGUEDOC.
p.s. Changed title to more suitable one