![]() |
|
A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Rules (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Thread: A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) (/showthread.php?tid=10174) |
A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - Laowai - 07-10-2008 Seems at this point that the vast majority of the server supports the amendment of the rule - i have pm'd Igiss and linked this thread, hopefully we will have further discussions on the issue. Well done all - This thread has been quite constructive and essentially flameless:) A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - Armageddon - 07-10-2008 I agree with the point only if the capital ship is used to assist in a factions embargo on a certain good. And the capship asks the trader to drop his cargo first. If he refuses then i see it perfectly in his rights to shoot down the trader. In the same way a lawful cruiser would shoot down a smuggler. But use for mainstream pirating no. A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - WilliamVitalArrow - 07-14-2008 Trading(smugglig) became a VEEEEERY profitable business in the whole Sirius. Lots of transports are passing WITHOUT ANY FEAR through the systems. There is not much job for escorters. So "DEAR" traders, if you are afraid of Cruisers or Battleships, do not be so GREEDY and get yourself an ESCORT. Voted "YES". A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - jimmy Patterson - 07-14-2008 ' Wrote:well - its much about dimensions here. - the police ( in its very original state ) deals with freighters. - the dromedary as the fastest of the freighters and the most efficient one - aswell as the rheinland freighter ( forgot the name ) which is the toughest. ' Wrote:Angel of Mercy, please tell me you're joking. The Admins frequently ban people for violating the letter of the law when their actions follow its spirit. Just look in the sanctions threads, I can point out several very harsh but entirely unnecessary sanctions. ' Wrote:Not good RP? You sure about that? Historically, Military ships have been used to prevent contraband from reaching friendly shores. One example that immediatly springs to mind was the US Navy's African Squadron, which interdicted the trans-atlantic slave trade in the years leading up to the American Civil War. In our modern times, the Navy is still the one dealing with pirates. In the US, the Coast Guard deals with smugglers, and they're a branch of the military. Viewed in that light, it's not so OoRP for military ships to be interdicting smugglers. At least that's how I feel about it... i agree completly just look at today and yoy get proof all those us coast guard comersials with the freigate or the helocoptor and the sniper rifle A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - Darkwolf475 - 07-14-2008 I agree to this, but up to a point. Pirating should not be allowed by ships higher than gunboat class (Pirating being defined as the taking of property or money from others). Enforcing contraband rules on the other hand should be allowed by all ships. There is a key difference between these two things. The key difference is when enforcing the contraband rules a ship must
A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - Laowai - 07-16-2008 ' Wrote:I agree to this, but up to a point. Pirating should not be allowed by ships higher than gunboat class (Pirating being defined as the taking of property or money from others). Enforcing contraband rules on the other hand should be allowed by all ships. There is a key difference between these two things. Of course - and if you read the original post. I made a very clear distinction between "pirating" and policing. Based on the results and comments submitted here its clear that around %70 of the community favours this rule change - i have pm'd Igiss with this poll and asked for it to be considered. Thanks to all for your insightful comments. A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - AdamantineFist - 07-16-2008 ' Wrote:The key difference is when enforcing the contraband rules a ship must As long as these are enforced, then we can eliminate this ridiculous double standard. A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - ScornStar - 07-16-2008 I just thought if pirates cannot pirate in capships above gunboat then why do civilians have a bomber? There is nothing for a civilian bomber to do, it should just be called the Xeno bomber. Otherwise all pirate factions have thier own bomber no need to give this ship to civilians if pirates "wouldnt pirate because its not cost effective" to civilians if there are no applicable targets. Yet as I said else where I could easily imagine a criuser looking at train and seeing plenty of cargo to sale on blackmarket and crew to ransom and sale to slavers. So I dont buy the RP reasons and find the PVP reasons weak too. This rule should go away and let the folk worried about PVP problems find another server. How ever I know Im in the minority so i follow the rules while they exist but just makeing those thoughts known and maybe get some other folks to review this rule and really think about the RP value lost when you can have traders happily wizzing by ships that should ice thier nerves with fear and send them running to the rock fields. At least let pirate Caps "police" thier systems. In the same way police and military do thiers. A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - Laowai - 07-16-2008 ' Wrote:I just thought if pirates cannot pirate in capships above gunboat then why do civilians have a bomber? Actually Scornstar - i agree with you and am on record as saying so. I personally believe pirates should be allowed to pirate in any class of capship. There is ample "real life" and Role Play justification for it, and yes - the need for a civilian bomber does seem to beg the question. However, as indicated, i'm only trying for a minor ammendment to the rule here - so steering clear of the "pirating" issue... this is about "policing" by unlawfuls in cap ships only. A Rule Ammendment - a poll with a point :) - chopper - 07-16-2008 Voted yes. Same thing would happen if someone smuggled Cardi trough Gamma, or Artifacts trough Alpha. And it should. |