+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Changes to piracy (/showthread.php?tid=28998)
Changes to piracy - Sprolf - 11-02-2009
Do you both seriously, honestly, think that a house would tolerate their enemies landing on a self declared "neutral" station in their space?
Changes to piracy - Benjamin - 11-02-2009
There's a bunch of people the IMG don't let dock on their freeports. Outcasts, for example.
Changes to piracy - Exsiled_one - 11-02-2009
Look, If things are like this - if we cannot dock on the Hood, I would like someone to tell me that who has an actual backing up to do so.
So an IMG leadership representative, or an admin.
Being kicked out of freeport is something I would gladly report to the Emperor, and it would all ofcourse have it's own RP consequences, just like my docking on Hood can have.
@Sprolf - zoners managed to have corsairs and outcasts in the same freeport.
Trafaglar base in New London as well, and don't tell me that the base is hidden, because I'm sure that they know where it is.
Changes to piracy - Linkus - 11-02-2009
The IMG are trying to be neutral in the war. They can't not allow Kusari folks to land on the Hood but they can't just let them land either.
I say the IMG let them land but also tell the Mollys everything about them.
Bretonia is happy, Kusari can't do a thing about it.
Changes to piracy - Sprolf - 11-02-2009
' Wrote:There's a bunch of people the IMG don't let dock on their freeports. Outcasts, for example.
' Wrote:The IMG are trying to be neutral in the war. They can't not allow Kusari folks to land on the Hood but they can't just let them land either.
I say the IMG let them land but also tell the Mollys everything about them.
Bretonia is happy, Kusari can't do a thing about it.
Not exactly Freeport, Ivan.
This is an IMG Freeeport , and it's not a Zoner Freeport. Big difference.
And, absolutely, let's dial Encheta or Seth up.
I need to reheat my coffee.
Changes to piracy - Zelot - 11-02-2009
If the Emperor heard the IMG was stopping Kishiro from docking on their Freeport's, he would probably move to nationalize IMG assets in the Taus, because it would be seen as IMG supporting Bretonia and acting against Kusari. Wonder what would happen if Holman and Java were suddenly given to Kishiro and Samura?
Edit: So is Freeport 4 not a Freeport?
Changes to piracy - Exsiled_one - 11-02-2009
Dibs on Holman.
See, war is a complicated thing. As I said before, every action has a reaction. Isn't it just better to sit idly and let things as they are?
Also, isn't IMG great with CR, that just agreed to side with Kusari? (this is tho.. lore adv. for me)
Changes to piracy - Sprolf - 11-02-2009
Let's let the BAF reclaim the Hood, then.
After all, the IMG there are nothing but squatters.
Changes to piracy - Belco - 11-02-2009
' Wrote:Still doesnt explain why someone would be stopped from docking on a freeport.
i'm pretty sure i've seen outcast NPC's on IMG freeports, such as 4 and maybe hood.... anyway, if they're willing to let a pirate house they're at war with onto their bases, i dont think they'd have a problem letting a faction someone else is at war with on.
it'd be like saying liberty traders cant use the IMG bases down in the omegas because rhienland would come up and crush them (Rhineland still claims omega-7 doesnt it?)
Changes to piracy - Exsiled_one - 11-02-2009
They're not squatters, they paid for that ship because BAF wanted to decommission it. But sure. Let the BAF take the ship, and not allow mollies in it.
Or you'ld allow mollies there? Maybe you'ld have the bridge commander be the guy who's brother was shot in the last weeks molly assault on BAF?