+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67)
+--- Thread: 5th Fleet - Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=133036)
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - June Rivers - 06-01-2020
Thanks for the good sportsmanship.
Seeing the LPI and 2 5th I thought I'd just be taken out now. Was allowed a duel and overall people were really nice without being nice inrp.
Will keep that in mind for the future. Once the whole merger is done we can possibly do some planned storyline/events if you would like?
Kudos to: Antoine.Duhamel, Lucius.Hopkins and LPI-Isla.Nazumaki
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Yannis - 06-01-2020
No problem, that was a pleasure here too! Sorry again for that poor mine I threw when you CD'd, and also for rushing things out a little, I was going to work so I needed this fight to start as soon as possible.
Kudos to you too, was a great fight indeed!
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - xenomorph - 06-01-2020
I would also like to kudos you for being respectful towards your opponents. Keep it up friends.
- Lyndon
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Kalhmera - 06-02-2020
(06-01-2020, 03:38 PM)June Rivers Wrote: Thanks for the good sportsmanship.
Seeing the LPI and 2 5th I thought I'd just be taken out now. Was allowed a duel and overall people were really nice without being nice inrp.
Will keep that in mind for the future. Once the whole merger is done we can possibly do some planned storyline/events if you would like?
Kudos to: Antoine.Duhamel, Lucius.Hopkins and LPI-Isla.Nazumaki
Thanks for the Positive Feedback for LPI! I am glad everything worked out well.
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Sava - 12-17-2020
I want to thank 5th|LNS-Kansas for his great sportsmanship and teamwork.
Even when your opponents have twice the number of ships, you remember that not giving your buddy a 1*1 is uncool.
[17.12.2020 14:44:00] 5th|LNS-Kansas: I'm not going to shoot at him. You're on your own.
----------
[17.12.2020 14:45:09] 5th|LNS-Kansas: I won't fight him
----------
[17.12.2020 14:48:36] 5th|LNS-Kansas: I'm not going to pile on Val.
[17.12.2020 14:30:18] Death: 46th|Summers.Wrath was put out of action by LR-Drunken.Sailor (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:32:12] Death: 46th|Greg.Splinter[R] was put out of action by MNS-Tevere (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:51:45] Death: -|-A.Aizkorri was put out of action by 46th|LNS-Lemon (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:52:32] Death: [LN]-LNS-Mount.Hood was put out of action by HS>Destino-Final (Gun).
[17.12.2020 14:56:42] Death: 5th|LNS-Kansas was put out of action by [XTF]-Nighthawk (Gun).
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Ice Princess - 12-17-2020
That is the first complaint I get about my faction NOT ganking someone. When we are getting ganked, we are not answering with a reverse gank. It's a game, you can die. This is not RL. If there is a single ship and more are incoming, it is still no reason to gank that one ship out of existence, even if he is more skilled. I am highly proud of my members that they even consider 1v1s when their opponent is way more skilled than them. Especially in snub duels.
Remember: A strategic gank is still a gank.
If you have a problem with our no-gank-policy then it is your problem, not really mine. I will stay true to it because I believe in fairplay. Even if we are getting ganked, we are not ganking back. Thanks.
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Kauket - 12-17-2020
(12-17-2020, 05:13 PM)Ice Princess Wrote: That is the first complaint I get about my faction NOT ganking someone. When we are getting ganked, we are not answering with a reverse gank. It's a game, you can die. This is not RL. If there is a single ship and more are incoming, it is still no reason to gank that one ship out of existence, even if he is more skilled. I am highly proud of my members that they even consider 1v1s when their opponent is way more skilled than them. Especially in snub duels.
Remember: A strategic gank is still a gank.
If you have a problem with our no-gank-policy then it is your problem, not really mine. I will stay true to it because I believe in fairplay. Even if we are getting ganked, we are not ganking back. Thanks.
I'd say its actually more malicious to decide to not help people who need it, especially those who are defending against a POB siege.
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Ice Princess - 12-17-2020
I am not sure if it's needed to drop a 3rd ship on a single Sarissa when it is already getting shot at by an Atlantis and a LABC.
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Groshyr - 12-17-2020
Salty Princess is better than just Princess because you can farm salt and get rich
RE: 5th Fleet - Feedback - Sava - 12-17-2020
(12-17-2020, 05:13 PM)Ice Princess Wrote: That is the first complaint I get about my faction NOT ganking someone. When we are getting ganked, we are not answering with a reverse gank. It's a game, you can die. This is not RL. If there is a single ship and more are incoming, it is still no reason to gank that one ship out of existence, even if he is more skilled. I am highly proud of my members that they even consider 1v1s when their opponent is way more skilled than them. Especially in snub duels.
Remember: A strategic gank is still a gank.
If you have a problem with our no-gank-policy then it is your problem, not really mine. I will stay true to it because I believe in fairplay. Even if we are getting ganked, we are not ganking back. Thanks.
In this case, it was a tactical possibility for the lawful side, which you have consciously ignored.
You have decided to wait till outcast hordes arrive and leave your team 0 chance of winning.
Your teammates isolated a careless outcast ship. They had you in the group, an OF capship, they counted on you. You let them down.
Edit:
[17.12.2020 14:42:35] [LN]-LNS-Mount.Hood: We either pile on him and prepare for fleet, or we just 1 vs 1 him and get killed in process.