+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411)
+---- Forum: Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=28)
+---- Thread: GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT (/showthread.php?tid=6172)
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - douglas_brad - 03-14-2009
---Incoming Transmission ---
------- Uploading Data -------
Subject: Engagement of BAF forces
User ID: Kei Hayashi
I shall be there to help push these dogs further into their hole.
--- End Transmission ---
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - darthbeck - 03-14-2009
just over one hour guys.......begin getting your engines fixed, and warmed up.
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - Slainte - 03-14-2009
Assuming i can get on ill be there to take back what is ours.
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - LoTeK_ - 03-14-2009
' Wrote:Looks like the Kusari Horde took advantage of last week's ion storm to sieze Northern Leeds!Couldn't be better, warming engines...30 minutes.
I suggest we have a fighter rumble in Leeds, between the BB Nagasaki, and the BB York.
Sound good?
Oh and I think this is in about 3 hours.
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - darthbeck - 03-15-2009
server is unhappy with us fighting and an eta fight...
later...
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - darthbeck - 03-15-2009
well...server is dead so the fight is a draw......next time. there will be a winner.
darned eta fight
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - Slainte - 03-15-2009
The fight was going well, but the server crashes caused us to call a stalemate.
*cough* though we were getting the upper hand *cough*
Question.. with the auto updater will it be able to let the BAF " take back" stations like Stokes and Glasgow?
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - mjolnir - 03-15-2009
' Wrote:Question.. with the auto updater will it be able to let the BAF " take back" stations like Stokes and Glasgow?
Things don't happen overnight here...
if you want I can find threads where it was discussed that these fights should have "move around" according to who wins/looses. The QCO leadership put up a few pages of arguments how it's not good to have "PVP performance" decide future of the war....suddenly it's fine?
Until the KNF/QCO fights were paused in June? KNF was winning fairly decisively. When they got restarted it was equal up until some 1-2 months ago. Last 3-4 weeks BAF has the upper hand.
I believe the decision on the changes for 4.85 was made sometimes in the Summer or even earlier as the very first versions of 4.85 (in September) already had KNF in Leeds.
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - Slainte - 03-15-2009
Maybe i wrote my question wrong ( my grammer sucks too :D)
It was not ment to sound like " if we win the fight can we have Stokes back please "
I know things take time, and a lot of effort by all involved. I simply ment that if one faction or the other holds the upper hand for a set amount of time would the Auto-updater be able to change ownership of bases/planets or would it take a new mod issue for that to take place. And i dont mean just BAF/KNF war here, theres the new Liberty/Rhineland stuff now as well.
I didnt know this has been discussed before in the past or if the Auto-updater was in line then as well.
My apologies if my question sounded off, it wasnt ment too.
GRN vs BAF,KNF,CR - Saturday Jan 8 2011 2000 GMT - mjolnir - 03-15-2009
No worries.
I was a bit harsh, but that's simply because I remember how some people on the bretonian side were so much against this.
I liked the idea that player actions should indeed affect the mod, even though it might be because of "pvp skills".
It should always be possible to pick some middle line between one station lost per battle... and no change ever.