+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+---- Forum: Discovery Mod Balance (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=31)
+---- Thread: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed (/showthread.php?tid=105610)
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Evo - 10-06-2013
(10-06-2013, 09:29 AM)Pilip Wrote:(10-06-2013, 09:16 AM)Evo Wrote: Since when does flying battleships solo being stupid equal me thinking or saying they should quit the game?
I do believe you should take a step back. I understand what you're trying to say but battleships are by no means a solo ship to fly. You have no cruise disruptor, for one.
You want to fly a cap solo? Use a cruiser. Those have to be SNAC'd normally unless you fly with the grace of a drunken infant, which equals bombers needing to get closer to hit you.
Skill u say? funny i dont see you mentioning ''targeting multiple White Dots instead of multiple Red cross (thing for which i saw too many here struggling to achieve,IDs, know anyone?) and by the way did you say many vanilla Xenos cruisers going against LSCs? nope, none; and caps Solo to fly? yes they are you only have to put some requirements there
I literally have no clue what you just said.
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Lythrilux - 10-06-2013
(10-06-2013, 09:36 AM)Jack_Henderson Wrote:Quote:Uh.. correct me if I'm wrong Jack but I believe Jack was talking about snac'ing caps and such while being shot at by snubs.
Ye. Someone did not read my post, caught a catchy phrase and answered.
My bad, sorry.
(10-06-2013, 10:08 AM)Evo Wrote:(10-06-2013, 09:29 AM)Pilip Wrote:(10-06-2013, 09:16 AM)Evo Wrote: Since when does flying battleships solo being stupid equal me thinking or saying they should quit the game?
I do believe you should take a step back. I understand what you're trying to say but battleships are by no means a solo ship to fly. You have no cruise disruptor, for one.
You want to fly a cap solo? Use a cruiser. Those have to be SNAC'd normally unless you fly with the grace of a drunken infant, which equals bombers needing to get closer to hit you.
Skill u say? funny i dont see you mentioning ''targeting multiple White Dots instead of multiple Red cross (thing for which i saw too many here struggling to achieve,IDs, know anyone?) and by the way did you say many vanilla Xenos cruisers going against LSCs? nope, none; and caps Solo to fly? yes they are you only have to put some requirements there
I literally have no clue what you just said.
He doesn't make sense usually.
I think he was trying to say that flying bombers is really easy and in vanilla the Xenos didn't own any bombers so they shouldn't in Disco. I also think he's been saying Xeno's suck this whole time. Or implying it.
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Evo - 10-06-2013
(10-06-2013, 10:15 AM)Lythrilux Wrote:(10-06-2013, 10:08 AM)Evo Wrote:(10-06-2013, 09:29 AM)Pilip Wrote:(10-06-2013, 09:16 AM)Evo Wrote: Since when does flying battleships solo being stupid equal me thinking or saying they should quit the game?
I do believe you should take a step back. I understand what you're trying to say but battleships are by no means a solo ship to fly. You have no cruise disruptor, for one.
You want to fly a cap solo? Use a cruiser. Those have to be SNAC'd normally unless you fly with the grace of a drunken infant, which equals bombers needing to get closer to hit you.
Skill u say? funny i dont see you mentioning ''targeting multiple White Dots instead of multiple Red cross (thing for which i saw too many here struggling to achieve,IDs, know anyone?) and by the way did you say many vanilla Xenos cruisers going against LSCs? nope, none; and caps Solo to fly? yes they are you only have to put some requirements there
I literally have no clue what you just said.
He doesn't make sense usually.
I think he was trying to say that flying bombers is really easy and in vanilla the Xenos didn't own any bombers so they shouldn't in Disco. I also think he's been saying Xeno's suck this whole time. Or implying it.
Bombers didn't exist in vanilla period. Hence why I just blew up a rheinland gunboat in a starflier.
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Pilip - 10-06-2013
(10-06-2013, 10:20 AM)Evo Wrote:(10-06-2013, 10:15 AM)Lythrilux Wrote:(10-06-2013, 10:08 AM)Evo Wrote:(10-06-2013, 09:29 AM)Pilip Wrote:(10-06-2013, 09:16 AM)Evo Wrote: Since when does flying battleships solo being stupid equal me thinking or saying they should quit the game?
I do believe you should take a step back. I understand what you're trying to say but battleships are by no means a solo ship to fly. You have no cruise disruptor, for one.
You want to fly a cap solo? Use a cruiser. Those have to be SNAC'd normally unless you fly with the grace of a drunken infant, which equals bombers needing to get closer to hit you.
Skill u say? funny i dont see you mentioning ''targeting multiple White Dots instead of multiple Red cross (thing for which i saw too many here struggling to achieve,IDs, know anyone?) and by the way did you say many vanilla Xenos cruisers going against LSCs? nope, none; and caps Solo to fly? yes they are you only have to put some requirements there
I literally have no clue what you just said.
He doesn't make sense usually.
I think he was trying to say that flying bombers is really easy and in vanilla the Xenos didn't own any bombers so they shouldn't in Disco. I also think he's been saying Xeno's suck this whole time. Or implying it.
Bombers didn't exist in vanilla period. Hence why I just blew up a rheinland gunboat in a starflier.
the bomber class vs any cap except gb is still a starflyer, an OP one of course that's the point here !! he has the damage of a capital large core vessel while keeping the agility of a Starflyer, get the point? in 86 there was never need for a Swarm of bombers(how u folks like to spell out) against a labc for example, 2 snac bombers was enough and with nova 1 would suffice! this is the whole issue here;the Not necessarily vets are using the lolcap numbers as an argument in order to keep they OP toys forever...and it will work forever i guess....
and lirilirilux he's the never beard one....pff ...immagine forced to stay with one like him on ts skype...and above all: buddy perspicacity problems? is still english dude ..just focus if u need
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Mister_X - 10-06-2013
Those new.guys that come here to play shouldn't be allowed to use cruisers and battleships anyway.....You say they get a bs, die and leave? Well I say good ridance, we don't need those "OMG I NOT IMMORTAL I QUIT" people anyway...It is this very idea of "we desperately need new players" that is killing this server...Cruisers and BS should either be SRP or official faction only, and before you say what you will, those who will leave cuz of that, let them, we are better off without them anyway...We have been focusing on getting new players so desperately, we didn't even see that capwhores, lolwuts and noobs took over the game....I would rather have 50 players on the server that are true RPers than 500 of these qq-ing lolwuts....This very thread proves my point, i doubt it was made by a man who RPs and uses his cap the way he is suposed to....
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Yber - 10-06-2013
I prefer the 500 qqing lolwuts.
Pilip, I challenge you. Take 3 snac bombers against my liberty dread/ sarissa and see how horribly you die.
If the so called capital shitp pilots can't deal with 2 bombers it's because they're completely useless, to the point that flying a zoner whale would make no difference in the result.
I do get that you can't kill them- as far as they don't try to kill you either.
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Lythrilux - 10-06-2013
Yber is correct.
Hell, even Mortars can kill snubs. It's just about timing, accuracy and a little thought.
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Pilip - 10-06-2013
(10-06-2013, 12:18 PM)Yber Wrote: I prefer the 500 qqing lolwuts.
Pilip, I challenge you. Take 3 snac bombers against my liberty dread/ sarissa and see how horribly you die.
If the so called capital shitp pilots can't deal with 2 bombers it's because they're completely useless, to the point that flying a zoner whale would make no difference in the result.
I do get that you can't kill them- as far as they don't try to kill you either.
i dont have 3 snac bombers
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Scumbag - 10-06-2013
(10-06-2013, 09:54 AM)Yber Wrote: Easy, close everything above gunboats for roleplayed requests. People tend to try to get the biggest thing they can when they start playing.
True, but i don't see that happening any time soon. Instead, i see noobs being given the recipe for failure and frustration. And a whole lot of elitism, arrogance and ego.
Would you start playing this game if you would have to go through the "noob" phase again?
RE: Bombers VS Capital Ships, Balance Needed - Narcotic - 10-06-2013
(10-06-2013, 04:32 AM)Scumbag Wrote: Bombers are not op it's snacs that are op.
SNACs used to have 4000m range in .85. Now it's 1500m which forces them to get much closer to their targets.
Just equip Solaris turrets with 2000 m/s speed and be the unbeatable battleship you are supposed to be.