![]() |
BMF feedback - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67) +--- Thread: BMF feedback (/showthread.php?tid=133204) |
RE: BMF feedback - Tabris - 01-01-2016 Remember Kids. this is a Feedback Thread. If you believe there are rules being broken you don't go here. You write up a report with the proof and send it in. Thanks! Enjoy your New Years Eve/Day! RE: BMF feedback - DonSam - 01-01-2016 (01-01-2016, 12:39 AM)Wesker Wrote: Lol this thread. As BMF member, I'd like to say that your words are not correct simply because BMF are not allowed to fly caps, thanks and happy new year! RE: BMF feedback - Neonzumi - 01-01-2016 I think he meant BMF's BAF BS/Carrier alts. RE: BMF feedback - DonSam - 01-01-2016 I don't see it as metagaming, If BMF switched to BAF caps to defend their business? specially that BMF are not allowed to fly caps, look it from different way, if BMF were allowed to fly caps and they switched to caps to defend their business will that be metagaming? I guess we need an admin to answer this. I guess admins have to allow BMF to switch to BAF caps on urgent matters only, or to allow BMF to fly caps then. RE: BMF feedback - Ace Razgriz - 01-01-2016 (01-01-2016, 10:58 PM)DonSam Wrote: I don't see it as metagaming, If BMF switched to BAF caps to defend their business? specially that BMF are not allowed to fly caps, look it from different way, if BMF were allowed to fly caps and they switched to caps to defend their business will that be metagaming? I guess we need an admin to answer this. I guess admins have to allow BMF to switch to BAF caps on urgent matters only, or to allow BMF to fly caps then. Its definately oorp, wouldnt really call it metagaming i guess... but thats like a really scumbag move to log a cap alt to deal with any problems RE: BMF feedback - Wesker - 01-01-2016 (01-01-2016, 11:21 PM)Ace Razgriz Wrote:(01-01-2016, 10:58 PM)DonSam Wrote: I don't see it as metagaming, If BMF switched to BAF caps to defend their business? specially that BMF are not allowed to fly caps, look it from different way, if BMF were allowed to fly caps and they switched to caps to defend their business will that be metagaming? I guess we need an admin to answer this. I guess admins have to allow BMF to switch to BAF caps on urgent matters only, or to allow BMF to fly caps then. HMS-Corkscrew, Mr.Hyde, HMS-Sparta the list goes on *looks through screens* RE: BMF feedback - Ace Razgriz - 01-01-2016 (01-01-2016, 11:23 PM)Wesker Wrote:(01-01-2016, 11:21 PM)Ace Razgriz Wrote:(01-01-2016, 10:58 PM)DonSam Wrote: I don't see it as metagaming, If BMF switched to BAF caps to defend their business? specially that BMF are not allowed to fly caps, look it from different way, if BMF were allowed to fly caps and they switched to caps to defend their business will that be metagaming? I guess we need an admin to answer this. I guess admins have to allow BMF to switch to BAF caps on urgent matters only, or to allow BMF to fly caps then. ^^^^ I have tried to rp (On a K'Hara granted) And as soon as I enter system and start rp'ing you log one of these and come and cloak disrupt me, and just kill me, K'hara no enjoy rp > ![]() RE: BMF feedback - DonSam - 01-01-2016 @Wesker I'm not sure if these caps belong to BMF members I will ask them, and I will ask them not to switch to caps again, thanks for your note, we will work on it. RE: BMF feedback - ilovesin - 01-01-2016 Never did any of that but K'Hara dont deserve any RP. The fact that it is expected of people to RP with K'Hara is a joke. My last encounters all went the same: *DECLOAK BS or Cruiser* PEW PEW PEW ... I agree swapping to CAPS is wrong though. But instead of posting here people should just report behavior they dislike if indeed it is against the rules. RE: BMF feedback - Neonzumi - 01-01-2016 I'm just wondering how does this have to do anything with K'hara. |