![]() |
|
Nomads - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: Nomads (/showthread.php?tid=134065) |
RE: Nomads - Venkman - 12-20-2015 (12-20-2015, 06:30 PM)Pavel Wrote:(12-20-2015, 06:11 PM)FluffReborn Wrote: This rule includes AFK trading and trading over/below the plane, as it is avoiding (that is, affecting/interfering other's RP) the roleplay or player-to-player interaction. If you are flying over the plane or purpose - you are in place in which there's no chance for other player to find you. What Pavel said. RE: Nomads - WesternPeregrine - 12-20-2015 (12-20-2015, 05:52 PM)FluffReborn Wrote:(12-20-2015, 05:07 PM)Hexagon Wrote: You could fly over the plane, or under it. Away from the normal places to get stopped by a pirate (...) For your information, it's not. RE: Nomads - Ryummel - 12-20-2015 (12-20-2015, 06:30 PM)Pavel Wrote: Lolno. Why isn't there a religion or church worshipping Pavel yet? RE: Nomads - The Savage - 12-20-2015 @Pavel Wait, so you are telling me that we are not sactioned for AFK trading over the plane, with all these traders obviously avoiding any player interaction on purpose? k. RE: Nomads - jammi - 12-20-2015 (12-20-2015, 07:27 PM)FluffReborn Wrote: @Pavel Honestly don't know why you think it would be - there's never at any point been a sanction to set that precedent. There's a massive difference between undesirable/scumbag behaviour and actually breaking the rules in such a manner that it requires punitive correction. RE: Nomads - Doria - 12-20-2015 There is nowhere in the rules the words "avoiding interaction". But the rule about Powergaming that you mentioned is very relevant in this nomad instakill thingy here. "**Powergaming: When one character forces actions against another player without giving them the chance to respond, affecting and/or interfering with the other characters roleplay." That's exactly what happens when a k'hara uncloaks and destroys a ship in seconds. Specialy in cases already mentioned here where an ongoing RP was interrupted. It's a breach of rule 1.7 and also of 3.1, again about the insuficient time to respond. RE: Nomads - evanz - 12-20-2015 or how about uncloaks and kills, just like what happened to me in NL uncloaks in front of me... [20.12.2015 18:25:43] (me): ohhhh crap!!! [20.12.2015 18:26:15] (me): oh just great [20.12.2015 18:26:30] (me): how is it going oh gracious one [20.12.2015 18:26:47] (me): your worshipfull kindness [20.12.2015 18:26:57] trial-by-Forum: [20.12.2015 18:27:01] Death: (me) was put out of action by trial-by-Forum brilliant, great game play (sarcasm) -Careful. Please ~D. RE: Nomads - Jazzi - 12-20-2015 The trick to it is learning these tactics and developing new ones to counter them. They want to use uncloak and murder tactics? Create bait, lures, manouevers, blah blah blah to counter their tactic until they do something new. Like with any stressor... we can complain OR we can do some about about it ingame and inrp. Time Bretonia had a working Nom unit, for example. RE: Nomads - jammi - 12-20-2015 (12-20-2015, 08:12 PM)Jazzi D Wrote: Time Bretonia had a working Nom unit, for example. Well, that would've been Bowex's anti-squid cloak-busting disruptor squad, but I got myself immediately instakilled like a mong.
RE: Nomads - pillow - 12-20-2015 (12-20-2015, 08:06 PM)evanz Wrote: or how about uncloaks and kills, just like what happened to me in NL wow that basically happened to the kpt in front of minor yesterday except it took like 15 seconds and not 2 minutes pretty sure this zalktis twatface was just out for blues mm rip |