+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Server Events (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=411)
+---- Forum: Official (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=550)
+----- Forum: Event Archive (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=274)
+----- Thread: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty (/showthread.php?tid=139353)
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - Caelumaresh - 05-15-2016
Is there any way Council ID can also engage the GRN, while not counting towards the victory? They have after all hated them for a very long time, and imo should be allowed to balance it out a little against the GRN.
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - TheShooter36 - 05-15-2016
if you gonna add council then let BAF and CR to engage GRN as well. so it would be a bit unbalanced that way. Council in California wouldnt makes sense (as well as BAF and CR)
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - WesternPeregrine - 05-15-2016
How about making a second set of events for those guys and GRN, in some other system.
Call it the splitting of Gallic forces, so to say.
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - Jack_Henderson - 05-15-2016
Approaching 4:1 ration now. Oh well. It's even worse than last time.
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - Thyrzul - 05-15-2016
Not really, the previous GRN vs LN in Mag and half of Cali event pretty much started like this too.
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - Caelumaresh - 05-15-2016
(05-15-2016, 09:35 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Approaching 4:1 ration now. Oh well. It's even worse than last time.
Quite logical, have you seen what the engagement was like just now?
When the LN start to engage without words, reengage (altho this all belongs in a report i know), piling 8 caps on 1 fighter etc, no miracle GRN pushes them back in force.
LN really isnt the saint you make them out to be here, Jack. I can quite understand the Gallic side atm, having flown there, altho i admit our side can do with a lot less ganking too.
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - Internity - 05-15-2016
(05-15-2016, 09:55 PM)Caelumaresh Wrote:(05-15-2016, 09:35 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Approaching 4:1 ration now. Oh well. It's even worse than last time.
Quite logical, have you seen what the engagement was like just now?
When the LN start to engage without words, reengage (altho this all belongs in a report i know), piling 8 caps on 1 fighter etc, no miracle GRN pushes them back in force.
LN really isnt the saint you make them out to be here, Jack. I can quite understand the Gallic side atm, having flown there, altho i admit our side can do with a lot less ganking too.
)))))))))))) GRN started first. There were no ganks from the LN side when the event started. I was right there and being shot like a fly.
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - Caelumaresh - 05-15-2016
(05-15-2016, 10:01 PM)Internity Wrote:(05-15-2016, 09:55 PM)Caelumaresh Wrote:(05-15-2016, 09:35 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Approaching 4:1 ration now. Oh well. It's even worse than last time.
Quite logical, have you seen what the engagement was like just now?
When the LN start to engage without words, reengage (altho this all belongs in a report i know), piling 8 caps on 1 fighter etc, no miracle GRN pushes them back in force.
LN really isnt the saint you make them out to be here, Jack. I can quite understand the Gallic side atm, having flown there, altho i admit our side can do with a lot less ganking too.
The fact that they started doesnt have to mean that LN takes over their behaviour though
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - theflyingrock - 05-15-2016
well look's like we have lost los angles
RE: Operation Tourbillon - Protecting Liberty - Jayce - 05-15-2016
GRN - California Combat
17.8% - 89/500
LN - California Combat
6.2% - 31/500
No rage needed.