![]() |
|
[RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Unofficial Factions and Groups (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=67) +--- Thread: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) (/showthread.php?tid=154509) |
RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Komitoza - 10-19-2017 Get over it for the love of Jesus Domezain. Hasn't it been like, 3 years already? RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Inferno - 10-19-2017 A reminder to remain civil and respect other people's views. No sniping at other people, or any other negative actions. RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Karlotta - 10-19-2017 Well to me the disbandment looks kind of done out of fear that someone else may do a better or equally good job at leading the faction, and a move made so people will miss Wesker more. To me, giving a bunch of vet goons the opportunities and pretexts to completely wreck a bunch of noobs' bases doesn't look so difficult, compared to trying to help said noobs enjoy the game. Also, I think just deleting the Jorm of everyone involved in the cheating would have been a better sanction than a long ban. Just saying. RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Komitoza - 10-20-2017 Not everything is a conspiracy. RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Thunderer - 10-20-2017 (10-19-2017, 11:52 PM)Karlotta Wrote: Well to me the disbandment looks kind of done out of fear that someone else may do a better or equally good job at leading the faction, and a move made so people will miss Wesker more. To me, giving a bunch of vet goons the opportunities and pretexts to completely wreck a bunch of noobs' bases doesn't look so difficult, compared to trying to help said noobs enjoy the game. Were you banned for so long because you have a tendency to bring unpleasant truths out in the open? RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Karlotta - 10-20-2017 Yes it is, and oh my, yes. RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Thunderer - 10-20-2017 Then I think that you should stop, because it might get you banned again. RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Shaggy - 10-20-2017 Well i've been busy at work but from what I hear alot has gone on including Wesker being banned for 6 months, and a few others only being given a warning while all of [RHA] have been punished with them becoming un official. Not only that from what i've read Admins are logging further back to see what other damage has been done to [RHA]. I personally would like to say it is a shame for [RHA] to go unofficial but there were possibly to many members within [RHA] to punish for abusing the exploits and glitches that have been known for years, ever since the Kruger Core-5 base in Omega7. Where the same "tactic's" where used, and from there it was used later to Solitaire Metropolis, then the two PoB's in Leeds towards the planet, then my own personal one of Minerva Research Station in Coronado and the latest being the DHC PoB in Munich which is/was owned by a player who left shortly after finding out his PoB was destroyed this way. Not only that the amount of hard work, dedication, time, effort, Sirius Credits, roleplay and most importantly patients that goes into building a PoB for them to be sieged and destroyed because of a bug with the weapon platforms is rather annoying and largely demotivating for those players who built them. But from what i've seen it has been the people inside [RHA] to be doing sieges mostly and having Wesker punished the most for it should not have been the way, Wesker was punished for abusing such bugs and glitches, yes, but he can only give inRP Orders to do things, and tell guys ooRP to do things, it is then the other members responsibility or not and decision to choice weather or not they wish to shoot the weapon platforms to bug them or not knowing full well that it is a violation of the server rules. So therefore punishing ALL of [RHA] was possibly a mistake in my eyes, but punishing ALL those members who abused this known glitch with evidence from previous sieges should have been the way. People from [RHA] have been talking in chats saying how frustrated, demotivated and angry they are because of [RHA] becoming non-official and the fact that RHA have a PoB that they have put so much hard work, and time into and now that the faction is not longer official they don't wish to continue doing what they were doing. Well I have one question for you. How do you think all those people, community members felt AFTER you/[RHA] sieged there PoB, months/years of hard work, patients, time, dedication, roleplay, motivation? RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - sindroms - 10-20-2017 A bit of a difference there. Being boldly direct is a good thing as long as you can write it with restraint and without sniping. RE: [RHA] Disbandment notice (new announcement) - Karlotta - 10-20-2017 (10-20-2017, 12:23 AM)Thunderer Wrote: Then I think that you should stop, because it might get you banned again. Don't be silly. |