+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: News and Announcements (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: Liberty Separatist ID added (/showthread.php?tid=162053)
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - Val - 06-17-2018
(06-17-2018, 10:31 AM)Amina Rodriges Wrote:(06-17-2018, 10:27 AM)Isha Wrote: How am I supposed to get the ID? Last time I checked Freeport didn't sell it and Marshall was red
you only get in on marshall but I recomend to join harmony or ssrt
I think only SSRT. Harmony official faction is pretty hard to be.
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - Kyoi - 06-17-2018
ID is available, I suggest getting a Unioner or Lane Hacker ID first, then going to Marshall to buy the separatist ID.
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - Thyrzul - 06-17-2018
>tfw you realize the general concept of fighting the authority one once used to be part of based on the suspicion of nomad infection without joining The Order has already been rejected once several years ago by the majority of the Gallic playerbase for being silly and edgy, yet has managed to appear, persist and flourish in several other places and circumstances ever since.
I guess if Fallen Grace would have happened today, it would be completely acceptable and valid RP. I wonder how would Gallia's activity look like with a Battlegroup Eglantine spicing things up.
I guess if Fallen Grace would have happened today, it would be completely acceptable and valid RP. I wonder how would Gallia's activity look like with a Battlegroup Eglantine spicing things up.
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - Kaze - 06-17-2018
Still dead. It wouldn't matter, as the problem is deeper in Gallia. But I do agree, Fallen Grace did kicked ass. Great story.
<3
<3
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - Isha - 06-17-2018
(06-17-2018, 11:46 AM)Kaze Wrote:Still dead. It wouldn't matter, as the problem is deeper in Gallia. But I do agree, Fallen Grace did kicked ass. Great story.
<3
Is it somewhere on the forums to read about it?
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - Thyrzul - 06-17-2018
https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=84054
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - sasapinjic - 06-17-2018
All IDs are equal , but some are more equal then others !
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - Jeremy Hunter - 07-09-2018
(06-17-2018, 11:20 AM)Thyrzul Wrote:>tfw you realize the general concept of fighting the authority one once used to be part of based on the suspicion of nomad infection without joining The Order has already been rejected once several years ago by the majority of the Gallic playerbase for being silly and edgy, yet has managed to appear, persist and flourish in several other places and circumstances ever since.
I guess if Fallen Grace would have happened today, it would be completely acceptable and valid RP. I wonder how would Gallia's activity look like with a Battlegroup Eglantine spicing things up.
It's because it was me, probably.
RE: Liberty Separatist ID added - oZoneRanger - 07-10-2018
(06-16-2018, 07:37 PM)Croft Wrote: This is a highly problematic ID.
(06-16-2018, 05:23 PM)Impyness Wrote: With Liberty Separatists gaining assets within the mod, the faction that founded it all requested an Independent ID to be added to the game.
Buyable from Marshall Station and Freeport 2 in Bering after the next restart it is set up as follows:
Pilot carrying this unlawful ID is a Liberty Separatist who:
- Can attack any ships within their Zone of Influence, except transports.
So essentially a big middle finger to the pirates on Freeport 2, a landgrab of Bering and a terrorist ID covering the most active part of Sirius. How on earth did this pass through the team? It is a literal terrorist ID, but wait theres more...
(06-16-2018, 05:23 PM)Impyness Wrote: - While using cruisers, can only attack in self-defense when outside their Zone of Influence.
Zone of Influence: Liberty, systems directly bordering Liberty
A terrorist ID with cruisers, I take it the Xeno ID will be next on the chopping block since this one essentially replaces it and then some?
+1