Discovery Gaming Community
IMG - Faction Feedback - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+--- Forum: Official Player Factions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=60)
+---- Forum: Inter-House (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=69)
+----- Forum: IMG| (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+----- Thread: IMG - Faction Feedback (/showthread.php?tid=60863)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - Jack_Henderson - 05-01-2015

1) You got the numbers wrong imo (IMG: 2 fighters, 1 light bomber vs: 2 bombers 1 Gb)
2) That's not "piling". If your guys had not insta-suicided and insta-ran, this could have been a fight that is actually in your favour. Not my problem that JM doesn't give fights that could be close.
3) JM diplo with Council is something I do neither know nor care for.
4) Fighting sometimes ends in not winning.

There was no mistake on the IMG| side.
You gave the reason yourself:
Quote:JM and IMG are enemies and you're merely fufilling your role by shooting your enemies

I see you wished for us to just let you scrap the "lolwuts".
Didn't happen this time.


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - Lythrilux - 05-01-2015

(05-01-2015, 11:12 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: 1) You got the numbers wrong imo (IMG: 2 fighters, 1 light bomber vs: 2 bombers 1 Gb)
There was something like a single indie pirate bomber who I think may have come near the very end. If you want to include that as a ship being on our side, then I'll include the two council battleships and IMG indie that were on your side.

(05-01-2015, 11:12 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: 2) That's not "piling". If your guys had not insta-suicided and insta-ran, this could have been a fight that is actually in your favour.
What? What does that even mean? What do you mean by insta-suicided? When we tried to run we get IMG| CD'ding us. We were already engaged by two battleships, with neither of us being outfitted to take on snubs. Making a quick evac would be our only option.

(05-01-2015, 11:12 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: Not my problem that JM doesn't give fights that could be close.
Are you implying that the only scenario where IMG| is able to shoot JM is when you take advantage of the fact that we're being shot at by rule-breaking lolwuts?

(05-01-2015, 11:12 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: 3) JM diplo with Council is something I do neither know nor care for.
Would you think Red Hessians engaging IMG would not appear as strange?

(05-01-2015, 11:12 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: 4) Fighting sometimes ends in not winning.
You at least can have the courtesy to not be a meanie as you go about that.

(05-01-2015, 11:12 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: There was no mistake on the IMG| side.
You gave the reason yourself:
Quote:JM and IMG are enemies and you're merely fufilling your role by shooting your enemies
Doesn't serve as a justification for the execution however.

(05-01-2015, 11:12 PM)Jack_Henderson Wrote: I see you wished for us to just let you scrap the "lolwuts".
Didn't happen this time.
What's the problem with scrapping anti-RP rule breakers? Of course I informed them of their errors later.


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - Jack_Henderson - 05-01-2015

Not gonna bother answering your points, Lyth.

Fact: This was a harmless interaction with no mistake on IMG| side.

If you want to make something big out of it, ...
a) do it without me.
b) do it somewhere else.

Jack

P.S: Just report rulebreakers


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - Lythrilux - 05-01-2015

The interaction was somewhat harmless, I'm just disappointed in the execution that lead to it. I would've been fine if IMG let us deal with the Council battleships first before a proper interaction began, but oh well.


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - Sabru - 06-21-2015

I want to commend the pilot of IMG|Frade,Rand for RPing a situation well and handling the two indie IMG battlecruisers who seemed to want to shoot me in Tau-23 earlier.


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - NoMe - 04-30-2016

Kill all JM at sight, is for me a job !

Signed indie img security


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - NoMe - 04-30-2016

here smallminor
location ?

incoming transmission

Hello guild

today we made a good mining operation, and a bit of money too! A guy from bmm have a bit helped me, after a late cargo scan, we have mined for a dauman, but at good price be quiet.

all things have been made in respect to IMG rules, the sirian traders *continuent* to need us, it's a good thing! Wink

i think, i can give a little amount of money for the IMG bank, please pm me the img bank account or here.

smallminor transmission out


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - GuapMan - 04-30-2016

hey bud.

I don't think you have the right thread for this post, maybe try posting here.
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=133377

Might help you out abit.



RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - NoMe - 04-30-2016

yeah you help!

but it's about diplomatic relations, we never know who ear us! in case, here, it's a secure chan!


RE: IMG - Faction Feedback - Lythrilux - 05-15-2016

Whilst at first I decided to pander to Jack's 'holier-than-thou' "we need to do some RP regarding Planet Nauru!" attitude, I had my doubts as it seemed to be coming from completely out of the blue. Lo and behold this appears. Of course Jack was only using that as a thinly veiled facade to power IMG| into things somehow.

What's next? The Zoners suddenly offer the IMG the secret of Iridium mining? I know for sure that this certainly isn't the first of IMG's - or Jack's for that matter - ruthlessly slimy attempt to force themselves into Delta.

If not for me wanting to allow Jayce the oppertunity for character development I would've have just stamped that RP with a flat out no like my HC originally suggested. It seems like I should have followed their advice, as well as my initial suspicions.

In fact that is what I'm going to be doing. I'm going to ignore that roleplay, and tell my members/faction to stick out of it. You've done an awfully good job of presenting an underhanded scheme as some sort of godsend for the community, and have successfully manipulated two of my members into getting involved in the process. Well no more, I say.