![]() |
|
Fair warning - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +--- Thread: Fair warning (/showthread.php?tid=142736) |
RE: Fair warning - Magnifique - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:09 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: I guess that some retroactive bans are in order for the fine players of SCRA| and the [LN] as well, since about, well it must be 3 or 4 years ago now, we were allowed to have access to assets that were not yet in the game. Thank you for bringing that up. No really (no sarcasm). Thank you. (09-02-2016, 12:09 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: Ban everyone, I guess? Ban? No. But some tar and feathers would be nice. (09-02-2016, 12:09 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: My god I'm glad I quit Disco. Quote:Ban? No. But some tar and feathers would be nice. RE: Fair warning - Magnifique - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:14 AM)Durandal Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:12 AM)Kangarawrawr Wrote: I'd like to point out that the players haven't been able to 'trust' the admins not to cheat sinse Virus gave his buddies infinite powercore dual SNACs on their Phantom snubs. Part of what is wrong with you. You poor brainwashed tool, you. *hugs* RE: Fair warning - lw'nafh - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:14 AM)Durandal Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:12 AM)Kangarawrawr Wrote: I'd like to point out that the players haven't been able to 'trust' the admins not to cheat sinse Virus gave his buddies infinite powercore dual SNACs on their Phantom snubs. Hate to pee in your cereal but a 'great admin' doesn't cheat. A great admin respects the spirit in which the rules they enforce are intended (and holds themselves to the same standards). Neither Dusty or Virus did that. Joe, on the other hand, was a pretty stand up dude. RE: Fair warning - Petitioner - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:12 AM)Kangarawrawr Wrote: I'd like to point out that the players haven't been able to 'trust' the admins not to cheat sinse Virus gave his buddies infinite powercore dual SNACs on their Phantom snubs. The fact that the old team would be preferable to this one is rather telling. RE: Fair warning - Sarawr!? - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:17 AM)Magnifique Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:09 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: I guess that some retroactive bans are in order for the fine players of SCRA| and the [LN] as well, since about, well it must be 3 or 4 years ago now, we were allowed to have access to assets that were not yet in the game. I mean, I was the leader of BOTH those groups at the time when these things occurred, I've no reason to conceal it, as it was considered legitimate and okay, if something to be kept "quiet", back then. It didn't harm anyone or anything, and it's bull that they're banning people for doing the same things now. RE: Fair warning - Ace Razgriz - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:14 AM)Durandal Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:12 AM)Kangarawrawr Wrote: I'd like to point out that the players haven't been able to 'trust' the admins not to cheat sinse Virus gave his buddies infinite powercore dual SNACs on their Phantom snubs. Joe, yes. The rest? I'm sorry but THAT is just inane. RE: Fair warning - Jeremy Hunter - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:20 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:17 AM)Magnifique Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:09 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: I guess that some retroactive bans are in order for the fine players of SCRA| and the [LN] as well, since about, well it must be 3 or 4 years ago now, we were allowed to have access to assets that were not yet in the game. Hi Sarawr. RE: Fair warning - Magnifique - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:12 AM)Kangarawrawr Wrote: I'd like to point out that the players haven't been able to 'trust' the admins not to cheat sinse Virus gave his buddies infinite powercore dual SNACs on their Phantom snubs. Tru dat. But... How do you feel about your past "I don't need to obey rules for you, cause admins don't like you cause you publicly criticized them for that on the forum lol, so Ima just keep pirating right here after you done blowed me up" ingame statements today? RE: Fair warning - Arioch - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:09 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: I guess that some retroactive bans are in order for the fine players of SCRA| and the [LN] as well, since about, well it must be 3 or 4 years ago now, we were allowed to have access to assets that were not yet in the game. We didn't ban everyone. With new anticheat methods, it's standard that if you flag the anticheat, you'll be placed in Bastille/unable to log in until you can post up and we can figure out why there was an anticheat log against you. 90% of the time it requires a game reinstall and you're good to go. It's not meant to be harsh, it's not meant to be unfair. It's meant as a precaution. It's been that way for a while. Seriously, it's not like you then have a log on the forums about you cause you flagged the anti cheat. Not like we're keeping record and punishing people on whim, nor is this a punishment. For example, If you get in a car crash, you're going to be questioned by police to what happened. Doesn't mean you're in trouble, doesn't mean you're going to jail. It means the police want to know what happened, and if you're not the cause of it, you're free to go. Nothing on your record (as far as a criminal report), nothing wrong. Just a precaution to figure out why. That's all. An extreme example, but when I see posts like "God i'm glad I quit", not sure what else to say. RE: Fair warning - Magnifique - 09-02-2016 (09-02-2016, 12:20 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:17 AM)Magnifique Wrote:(09-02-2016, 12:09 AM)Sarawr!? Wrote: I guess that some retroactive bans are in order for the fine players of SCRA| and the [LN] as well, since about, well it must be 3 or 4 years ago now, we were allowed to have access to assets that were not yet in the game. Thank you. Thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you thank you For your posts, Sarah. |