+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Connecticut needs to GO! (/showthread.php?tid=178734)
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - SnakThree - 04-21-2020
Worst idea ever.
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - -Rax- - 04-21-2020
I wonder if people make this threads because they're REALLY bored or they're actually REALLY triggered with the overall existence of conn.
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - SnakThree - 04-21-2020
(04-21-2020, 11:57 AM)-Rax- Wrote: I wonder if people make this threads because they're REALLY bored or they're actually REALLY triggered with the overall existence of conn.
I think they have no understanding of how Disco works to suggest such wild ideas.
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - Avalanche - 04-21-2020
We shouldn't ever put people down for making threads. No matter what you think of the topic. Doing so will just result in less people posting and this forum dying.
Every thread has the potential to ignite new ideas and discussions beyond their original topic.
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - Dark.Star - 04-21-2020
Connecticut needs to stay obv, as simple as that.
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - Reddy - 04-21-2020
(04-21-2020, 11:57 AM)-Rax- Wrote: I wonder if people make this threads because they're REALLY bored or they're actually REALLY triggered with the overall existence of conn.
Well most are stuck indoors these days, boredom is what follows
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - Sir_Now - 04-21-2020
Well, i wasnt trolling or lolwutting nor extremely bored when posting this. Just wanted some discussion, so that went pretty well considered that way.
(04-21-2020, 06:21 AM)Traxit Wrote: General consensus says "No".
Try again in a few years later, preferably never.
But i can see that indeed a vast majority here isnt very charmed about the idea of removing Connecticut.
The only good argument i heard was that its an extra feature of the game and a lot of fun to have acces to some instant pvp.
So im not convinced yet, but that doesnt matter, i dont have to go there so i just ignore Connecticut.
Anyways thanks for all the input folks, it was a riot, thumbs up for everyone taking part in the discussion.
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - Y'berg - 04-21-2020
(04-21-2020, 11:57 AM)-Rax- Wrote: I wonder if people make this threads because they're REALLY bored or they're actually REALLY triggered with the overall existence of conn.
Drugs, man.
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - Backo - 04-21-2020
(04-20-2020, 05:24 PM)Haste Wrote: I think the players that currently sit in Connecticut, would, for the most part, just not log in at all. It's a convenient place to shoot people with all sorts of loadouts (You can't conveniently do a "practice" Lynx vs Guardian duel in Virginia).
But I've also been annoyed at seeing 30 people in Conn that I would love to shoot outside of there instead, so I get where you're coming from in that regard.
This sums my opinion pretty well. Especially the second part. )^:
RE: Connecticut needs to GO! - NixOlympica - 04-21-2020
(04-20-2020, 09:38 PM)Infinity Wrote: Yea disable player location in player list.
Yeah, because randomly flying through systems looking for an interaction would obviously be an amazing experience in a server that already has arguably too few players for too many systems. This is even worse idea than removing Conn. Good job!