![]() |
|
DELETE - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +---- Forum: Discovery Mod Balance (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=31) +---- Thread: DELETE (/showthread.php?tid=114290) |
DELETE - SnakThree - 04-08-2014 DELETE RE: Codenames - New Values - SMGSterlin - 04-08-2014 Seems like alot of work for not much of a change... DELETE - SnakThree - 04-08-2014 DELETE RE: Codenames - New Values - SMGSterlin - 04-08-2014 (04-08-2014, 02:56 PM)Snak3 Wrote:Irrelevant, it still seems like alot of work for not much of a change.(04-08-2014, 02:55 PM)SMGSterlin Wrote: Seems like alot of work for not much of a change...You don't even play. RE: Codenames - New Values - Haste - 04-08-2014 Seems fairly reasonable. Don't be afraid to take an even bigger chunk of efficiency away from the highest DPS ones, though. Might give people a reason to go for a slightly less powerful gun in exchange for higher efficiency. Like, put Archangels at 4.2, Excals at 4.3, and so forth. Something along those lines. DELETE - SnakThree - 04-08-2014 DELETE RE: Codenames - New Values - Sol - 04-08-2014 Wait what. PS - It might be good to try the wicked Archangels with slower ships but huge cores. PPS - No wait. No. PPPS- No comment. RE: Codenames - New Values - Pancakes - 04-10-2014 Sol so confused ~.~ I like it |