+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery General (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Armor Question/Opinion (/showthread.php?tid=136446)
Armor Question/Opinion - wanderer95 - 02-25-2016
Since most people already have AU VIII, HAU IV, and at the very least a CAU V or CAU VI why shouldn't they just be included in the purchase of the ship package?
RE: Armor Question/Opinion - sindroms - 02-25-2016
Because you tend to accumulate mid tier armors over time.
RE: Armor Question/Opinion - Findarato Veneanar - 02-25-2016
Probably party because there is such a variety of opinion on what armour to use on what ship.
Also, since you need a enough credits on you to buy the full ship package rather than just the ship it would just be a bad idea, we already have to deal with the annoyance of the extra cost of the ship packages, no need to make it worse.
RE: Armor Question/Opinion - Mephistoles - 02-25-2016
Because maybe I want to buy a ship without any armour.
Armour is an optional upgrade. That's it.
RE: Armor Question/Opinion - Epo - 02-25-2016
Well, if you ask me, armours should be removed and the current armour moneysinks would become armour platings which increase ships cargo space instead of nerfing damage. Well, increasing cargo space would even make more sense inRP, cuz lets say using better stuff to build ship's armour could be equal a lower need for physical space they take. And still, the amount of cargo space increased by armours shouldn't be too high.
People would stop complaining about cargo space, rich/poor balance would be better etc etc.
Also, armours would pay for themselves. Eg. mounting additional 200 cargo space would increase income from trading a bit. Still being low enough not to ruin the balance, but fine enough to be worth mounting let say
And no more qq he has better armour that's why he has killed me qq
RE: Armor Question/Opinion - Wesker - 02-25-2016
(02-25-2016, 08:39 PM)Epo Wrote: Well, if you ask me, armours should be removed and the current armour moneysinks would become armour platings which increase ships cargo space instead of nerfing damage. Well, increasing cargo space would even make more sense inRP, cuz lets say using better stuff to build ship's armour could be equal a lower need for physical space they take. And still, the amount of cargo space increased by armours shouldn't be too high.
People would stop complaining about cargo space, rich/poor balance would be better etc etc.
Also, armours would pay for themselves. Eg. mounting additional 200 cargo space would increase income from trading a bit. Still being low enough not to ruin the balance, but fine enough to be worth mounting let say
And no more qq he has better armour that's why he has killed me qq
Given current gun stats that's a bad idea
RE: Armor Question/Opinion - Epo - 02-25-2016
(02-25-2016, 08:51 PM)Wesker Wrote:(02-25-2016, 08:39 PM)Epo Wrote: Well, if you ask me, armours should be removed and the current armour moneysinks would become armour platings which increase ships cargo space instead of nerfing damage. Well, increasing cargo space would even make more sense inRP, cuz lets say using better stuff to build ship's armour could be equal a lower need for physical space they take. And still, the amount of cargo space increased by armours shouldn't be too high.
People would stop complaining about cargo space, rich/poor balance would be better etc etc.
Also, armours would pay for themselves. Eg. mounting additional 200 cargo space would increase income from trading a bit. Still being low enough not to ruin the balance, but fine enough to be worth mounting let say
And no more qq he has better armour that's why he has killed me qq
Given current gun stats that's a bad idea
Well, I agree that it would make it necessary to increase a few ship's hull. But the idea isn't that bad, I think.
For example autoapplying cau5 or cau6 to all caps including funboats and battletransports.