+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Discovery Development (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Discovery Mod General Discussion (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=37)
+--- Thread: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? (/showthread.php?tid=141437)
Pages:
1
2
Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Titan* - 07-25-2016
So liberty,rheinland and bretonia have 2 battleship class but kusari and gallia dont... I wonder why?
Maybe gallia doesnt need another battleship because valor very good at killng anything
What about kusari?
Kusari needs light battleship to pew against light battleships (like togo)
Rheinland have medium carrier and its very good at killing overlords,murmillos and jormuns
Bismarck for killing legates and tanking
I dont know maybe kusari dont need second battleship in irp but it would be great to have it because all of sirian houses has 2 battleship
I just wonder why kusari didnt get second bs for years
Thats why i created the thread
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Flash™ - 07-25-2016
Gallia also doesn't have a Cruiser, but that's a topic for another time. (Unless someone can create one, that would be awesome. Also of course, if approved by Devs.) I don't see a point in a Carrier for Gallia at the moment; a Cruiser would be much more fitting in my opinion.
As for Kusari getting a Carrier, that would be interesting with their fleets rebuilding and stuff. Wouldn't be a bad addition.
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Vendetta - 07-25-2016
(07-25-2016, 06:05 AM)Flash™ Wrote: Gallia also doesn't have a Cruiser, but that's a topic for another time. (Unless someone can create one, that would be awesome. Also of course, if approved by Devs.)
soon
if only the devs would stop their dumb strike, we could see progress again (:
(07-25-2016, 06:05 AM)Flash™ Wrote: As for Kusari getting a Carrier, that would be interesting with their fleets rebuilding and stuff. Wouldn't be a bad addition.
This would be an interesting concept, but Kusari would need a significantly more active playerbase before anything happens there.
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Burnout - 07-25-2016
(07-25-2016, 06:05 AM)Flash™ Wrote: Gallia also doesn't have a Cruiser
http://discoverygc.com/wiki/%22Obstinate%22_Gallic_Royal_Navy_Cruiser
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Flash™ - 07-25-2016
(07-25-2016, 06:10 AM)Burnout Wrote:(07-25-2016, 06:05 AM)Flash™ Wrote: Gallia also doesn't have a Cruiser
http://discoverygc.com/wiki/%22Obstinate%22_Gallic_Royal_Navy_Cruiser
BATTLEcruiser, not a CRUISER. It does classify as a "Cruiser", but you know what I'm talking about. No need to be a smartass.
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Commander ZooM - 07-25-2016
(07-25-2016, 06:10 AM)Burnout Wrote:(07-25-2016, 06:05 AM)Flash™ Wrote: Gallia also doesn't have a Cruiser
http://discoverygc.com/wiki/%22Obstinate%22_Gallic_Royal_Navy_Cruiser
cruiser not a battle cruiser, while still classed the same in ID restrictions as in you can fly a battle cruiser when ID says cruiser is largest class they are still two very different class of ships eg, donau rheinland cruiser - Tirpitz rheinland battle cruiser
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Reid - 07-25-2016
Kusari's fleet is still messed up from the battle with Gallia/new civil war, and they're focusing production on the already new Komainu battlecruiser
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - Psyentific - 07-25-2016
Please do not confuse Battlecruiser with Battleship. The British Royal Navy did that in 1916 and paid for it dearly.
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - WesternPeregrine - 07-25-2016
"carriers" should have been at Battlecruiser tier at most. Above that it should be divided between Battleships and Dreadnoughts.
I believe only Liberty has ships to fill all possible types of capital vessels atm. Everyone else is missing 3 or four types, depending on their development.
However, balancing and standardization of stats have made many of these classes redundant.
RE: Kusari Carrier? Gallic Carrier? - DragonRider - 07-25-2016
(07-25-2016, 10:22 AM)Psyentific Wrote: Please do not confuse Battlecruiser with Battleship. The British Royal Navy did that in 1916 and paid for it dearly.
Now you got my attention. Do continue.