![]() |
|
To: Ingenuus Research Group from Jack Spang - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Communication Channel (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +--- Thread: To: Ingenuus Research Group from Jack Spang (/showthread.php?tid=161641) |
To: Ingenuus Research Group from Jack Spang - Jack Spang - 06-02-2018 ...hack.initiated...connecting.to.Spyglass.Network...decryption.in.progress... ...Operative.Jack.Spang.recognized...encoding.transmission... ...uploading.data... ![]() ![]() To whom it may concern, Firstly let me introduce myself, my name is Jack Spang and I am a member of the Lane Hackers. I have currently been assigned to research into shields and more importantly being able to combine the types of shields into a more universal prototype. However I have hit a snag and am in need of your help. So I am proposing a joint venture into the research. Here is what I have so far... Because electrons are identical to (i.e., indistinguishable from) each other, the wave function of an atom with more than one electron must satisfy special conditions. The problem of identical particles does not arise in classical physics, where the objects are large-scale and can always be distinguished, at least in principle. There is no way, however, to differentiate two electrons in the same atom, and the form of the wave function must reflect this fact. The overall wave function Ѱ of a system of identical particles depends on the coordinates of all the particles. If the coordinates of two of the particles are interchanged, the wave function must remain unaltered or, at most, undergo a change of sign; the change of sign is permitted because it is Ѱ2 that occurs in the physical interpretation of the wave function. If the sign of Ѱ remains unchanged, the wave function is said to be symmetric with respect to interchange; if the sign changes, the function is antisymmetric. ![]() ![]() The Schrödinger equation cannot be solved precisely for atoms with more than one electron. The principles of the calculation are well understood, but the problems are complicated by the number of particles and the variety of forces involved. The forces include the electrostatic forces between the nucleus and the electrons and between the electrons themselves, as well as weaker magnetic forces arising from the spin and orbital motions of the electrons. Despite these difficulties, approximation methods introduced by the English physicist Douglas R. Hartree, the Russian physicist Vladimir Fock, and others in the 1920s and 1930s have achieved considerable success. Such schemes start by assuming that each electron moves independently in an average electric field because of the nucleus and the other electrons; i.e., correlations between the positions of the electrons are ignored. Each electron has its own wave function, called an orbital. The overall wave function for all the electrons in the atom satisfies the exclusion principle. Corrections to the calculated energies are then made, which depend on the strengths of the electron-electron correlations and the magnetic forces. So in summation, the harmonic structure of our shields have a flaw that can be overcome by usage of certain weaponry. And the following formula, p ,⟨ p | ψ ⟩ ≡ f ( p ) = ∫ ψ ( x ) e − i p x d x p|psi f(p)=psi (x)e^{-ipx}dx} Enhances the positron shields but it's combining this with the gravitational forces that both the Graviton and Molecular shields use that is causing me some issues. And thus I am forced to seek outside assistance. Any research you may have conducted into this subject would be appreciated ![]() RE: To: Ingenuus Research Group from Jack Spang - Jack Spang - 06-10-2018 ...hack.initiated...connecting.to.Spyglass.Network...decryption.in.progress... ...Operative.Jack.Spang.recognized...encoding.transmission... ...uploading.data... ...boosting..signal..strength... ...encryption.in.progress...disconnecting.from.network...hack.terminated... |