![]() |
||||
|
To: "Bowman"; Group Clarion - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Communication Channel (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +--- Thread: To: "Bowman"; Group Clarion (/showthread.php?tid=210521) |
||||
To: "Bowman"; Group Clarion - Sally - 01-07-2026 ![]() Sender: "Jackal". Encryption: TRUE. Subject: Poaching. So you want to get your hands on LSF pawns to try your luck interrogating? I'd like to know how exactly would that work because in my experience people won't talk unless you're offering them something in return, and LSF bootlickers are even harder to convince. Forget about torture, that'll get you worse than nowhere as tortured people have tendency to straight up lie and tell you what you wanna hear to make you stop, or you might fuel their resolve to refuse talking until they're too much of a pulp to even feel any pain. I'd say that instead of putting our people in the line to capture pawns alive, wasting supplies and space with them, my approach to your proposal is that we could start focusing on higher-ups, do some background check on them, find out where their families are, do some kidnap job and then try our luck with an exchange deal, we could even get some of our guys back in our side that way. Nothing gets these guys to play along like seeing their wives and offspring tied to a tree and dangerously close to the local predatory fauna Erie has to offer... But that sounds like a lot of work, right? Because it is, specially for the numbers we have right now, this line of work is more suited for Xenos or Hackers... or -some- Rogues, since they have far more numbers, and the Xenos would've done this themselves already if they knew where to start, sadly I haven't heard any rumors about Xenos pulling that stunt successfully, though. I do agree and I'm fully aware that LSF spies are a pain and have been a pain for too long for our operatives both in space and land, but putting ourselves on the line to get a bunch of nobodies to try our luck with interrogation is the wrong approach. I think our best bet to reduce damage is to convince the local Xenos and Hackers to offer their experience and knowledge in dismantling their intel networks, the higher-ups in our side being taken down shows that too much organization is a compromise, keeping things loose and cells small makes infiltration much harder and Chaos is our best friend, maybe the guys that try to establish a military-like and centralized hierarchy among our cells should go into some suspect list, food for thought. I'll await your response, as we talk we're getting some transports ready to start moving shipments around the area. Always busy. RE: To: "Bowman"; Group Clarion - Proselyte - 01-07-2026
Z-NET ACCESS 4.0 | S E C U R E | CLARION version 0573.9523711B. Copyright Alex Maccabelli, 832 A.S., Confederacy of Freeports - You are using PRO edition. ![]() User ID:__"Bowman" Target ID:__"Jackal" Subject:__Re: Poaching.
RE: To: "Bowman"; Group Clarion - Sally - 01-09-2026 ![]() Sender: "Jackal". Encryption: TRUE. Subject: Re: Re: Poaching. Alright, given it doesn't mean too much change in our M-O I'll entertain your approach, we'll run some quick scans whenever the smoke settles when we cross paths with their puppets to see if there's still some in one piece, tractor pods and then drop them somewhere in Pinnacle or Milford for your crew to retrieve. I'll get in touch again if we get a good batch to deliver. As for the Hackers no, I don't have close contact with them, I've worked with Xenos far more than Hackers in the past, because most Hackers are more interested in hedonism than political warfare and terrorism. RE: To: "Bowman"; Group Clarion - Proselyte - 01-11-2026
Z-NET ACCESS 4.0 | S E C U R E | CLARION version 0573.9523711B. Copyright Alex Maccabelli, 832 A.S., Confederacy of Freeports - You are using PRO edition. ![]() User ID:__"Bowman" Target ID:__"Jackal" Subject:__Re: Re: Re: Poaching.
|