Discovery Gaming Community
Mass Reviews - Printable Version

+- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums)
+-- Forum: Rules & Requests (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: Site & Forum Feedback (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+---- Forum: Discovery Wiki (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=40)
+---- Thread: Mass Reviews (/showthread.php?tid=58601)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


Mass Reviews - Total.Absolution - 04-18-2011

Since I've had a bit of spare time, I've been rolling around on the Wiki, looking at ship reviews, and noticed a problem.

There aren't that many.

So, over the next few weeks, I'll be posting here with links to what ships I've reviewed. (At the moment I'm doing lots of Liberty ships) If you want, you can post below with a link to what ships you've reviewed, and I'll edit this post with a link to what you edited. Also, try and make a priority of ships that have no review. Feel free to provide feedback on how I'm doing, and how biased ( Don't shoot me for using that word please ) I am.

Links:
Refer to post number 4 by Denelo for the current ships that need reviews. ( I wouldn't bother trying to mess with the old mk1 light fighters and the like )

Reviews by me:
Liberty Assault Battlecruiser
Liberty Upholder Bomber
Liberty Assault Carrier
Waran Bomber
Lane Hacker Gunship
Virage
Rheinland Wraith
Charon
Bretonian Templar

Reviews by Zukeenee:
Wyrm

Reviews by ViRuS:
Mamoru FA Bomber

Reviews by Prysin:
Sarissa Outcast Battleship
Storta Outcast Destroyer
Bayonet LH Fighter
Havoc Mk II Bomber

Reviews by F.E.O:
Titanic Heavy Tanker
Arrow Light Fighter

Reviews by El Vado:
Kingsfisher Heavy Fighter

Credits:
So far just a huuge kudos to Denelo, who has provided links in the 4th post to a large number of ships that need reviews. ( I wouldn't bother trying to mess with the old mk1 light fighters and the like )
Also thanks to Prysin for pitching in a lot of reviews.


Mass Reviews - Valinor - 04-18-2011

Seems good to me, well done:)


Mass Reviews - Total.Absolution - 04-18-2011

' Wrote:Seems good to me, well done:)
Thanks, and added some more ships that I reviewed.


Mass Reviews - Denelo - 04-18-2011

This may help.

Entirely unreviewed ships:

Light Fighters

Arrow
Basalt
Bloodhound
Caracal
Civilian Shuttle
Decurion
Drake
Defender
Falchion
Gecko
Gitano
Griffin
Hawk
Ki
Labraid (Voidrunner)
Mistral
Mistral Noir
Nomad Morph
Partisan
Patriot
Phantom
Penumbra (Slipstream)
Sea Serpent
Tanto

Heavy Fighters

Agama
Bayonet
Centurion
Crusader
Cuirassier
Cuirassier Noir
Defender
Dragon
Executioner
Falcon
Karasu
Kingfisher
Marauder
Moldy Crow
Paladin
Saishi
Serval
Stiletto
Switchblade
Valkrie
Wolfhound

Very Heavy Fighters

Anubis
Arbeiter
Black Dragon
Blossom
Chimaera
Dacite
Insurgent
Shadow (Raven's Claw)
Wasupu

Super Heavy Fighters

Mafic
Recycler

Special/Unique Snubcraft

Camera Ship

Bombers

Basilisk
BHG Bomber (Moray)
Broadsword
Challenger
Fafnir
Havoc Mk II
Jaguar
Jaguar Noir
Kaichou
Nodachi
Revolution
Sekhmet
Adad
Thor
Thor Mk II
Umibozu

Freighters

Aurochs
Civilian Freighter
Clydesdale
Courier
Drone
Grizzly
Humpback
Ragnar (RAT)
Tarvos
X-Shuttle

Liners

Royal Liner

Transports

Akegata (CTrans)
Behemoth
Colossus
Democritus (Yacht)
Geisha (Kusari Yacht)
Kamome
Kujira
L'Ane
Percheron
Raba
Ryuujin
Shire (Bretonian CTrans)
Vache

Gunboat

Hachiman
Nammu (Nomad Gunboat)
Scorpion
Storm

Cruisers

Bretonia Destroyer
Corvo
Umbrage (Huntress)
Irra (Nomad Cruiser)
Kagutsuchi
Kusari <strike>Heavy Gunboat</strike> Destroyer
Liberty Siege Cruiser
Obstinate (Council)
Obstinate (GRN)
Rheinland Pirate Cruiser
Scylla
Storta
Thresher
Typhoon
Vidar

Battlecruisers

Bullhead

Battleships

Aquilon (Zoner Carrier)
Mako
Marduk (Nomad Battleship)
Ranseur
Redemption
Sarissa
Spyglass
Togo
Zephyr

Special/Unique Capital Ships

Battlestar II
Necrosis
Satsuma (Kusari Imperial Yacht)
Persephone
Venator

Please note that these are ships that have no review at all, not ships that need a review. Some ships - like the Kusari Gunboat and Liberty Gunboat - have small, highly ineffective 1-2 sentence reviews. In all honesty, any ship could use a review.

In other news: "You are about to close 263 tabs. Would you like to continue?"


Mass Reviews - Total.Absolution - 04-19-2011

Thanks Den! Added a note for people to look at your post to know what needs reviews.


Mass Reviews - Zukeenee - 04-19-2011

Just wrote one up for the Wyrm. I'll see about making some more eventually.

One thing that I've noticed, though: Why do all the reviews go under the "Handling" category? Not all the reviews are about how a ship handles. Wouldn't it be better to paste the actual agility and turning stats from FLStat in that category, and make a new category altogether for reviews?


Mass Reviews - Total.Absolution - 04-19-2011

' Wrote:Just wrote one up for the Wyrm. I'll see about making some more eventually.

One thing that I've noticed, though: Why do all the reviews go under the "Handling" category? Not all the reviews are about how a ship handles. Wouldn't it be better to paste the actual agility and turning stats from FLStat in that category, and make a new category altogether for reviews?

Added Zukeenee to the reviews section, and the Wyrm.

As for why they go under the handling, I'm not sure. What you have is a good idea, and it oughta be implemented. But I'm just a reviewer, I try and not mess around with the wiki too much.

Edit: Added the Virage and the Wraith, and starting a review on the Charon

Double Edit: Charon finished

Triple Edit: Templar Added


Mass Reviews - Virus- - 04-19-2011

In the Virage's review, it says it doesn't count the Manta, but I believe you meant the Hammerhead, because the Manta is far from sucking:)
Also, I would be glad to help, but really, I haven't flown many ships.


Mass Reviews - VoluptaBox - 04-19-2011


I will help with this too. Will write a few reviews and send them to you over skype so you can post. Too lazy to make wiki account :$


Mass Reviews - Cond0r - 04-19-2011

There is a problem with your reviews. Namely, you write them based only off of number crunching. Like the Wraith review for example. If I want to read up on number crunching I will just open up the wiki and compare the numbers.

If you want to write a review you have to fly that ship for a certain period of time so you know how it behaves in different combat situations, and how good it is with different maneuvers, and not just compare numbers with other ships.

I dont like them really. If you just want to spam reviews on every possible ship thats fine with me, but in my opinion, Quality > Quantity.

And Im curios, how much time did you spend flying the Templar? From what I see in your review, I'd say under 5 hours.

And please dont take this post as some sort of assault, take it as a form of advice or simply ignore it.