To: Independent Miners' Guild - Printable Version +- Discovery Gaming Community (https://discoverygc.com/forums) +-- Forum: Role-Playing (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: Communication Channel (https://discoverygc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +--- Thread: To: Independent Miners' Guild (/showthread.php?tid=64733)

To: Independent Miners' Guild - Petitioner - 08-14-2011 John Carpenter speaking. These picture will speak for themselves, gentlemen. You can clearly see Freeport 4 right behind me in the picture detailing the transfer of credits to this common ruffian. I hope you plan on enforcing the No-Fire Zone around this installation in the future, sirs. Carpenter, out. >>piratF6 01.img >>piratF6 02.img >>piratF6 03.img To: Independent Miners' Guild - AeternusDoleo - 08-14-2011 **** Incoming Transmission **** From: Johnathan Sanders CC: Carrier Perihelion To: Interspace Commers, per attention of John Carpenter Subject: Freeport 4 Encryption: Light/Civilian Good day sir, As the ruffian indicated, he is not of the caring kind, so I reckon he won't mind the Freeport's defense grid recognizing him as a target in the near future. I'll also inform the Perihelion to keep a lookout for this particular vessel. But on a sidenote, has Interspace Commerce fallen on such harsh times that it is unable to cover even their largest transports with a minimal escort? The IMG is not a private security firm. Our interest in the No Fire Zone is the safety and security of the station and it's inhabitants. Even a lone supertrain should be able to keep a mercenary or two on the payroll. Had you done so, your transport could have moored and be covered by the station shielding, while your escort could have driven the ruffian off. Regards, - Johnathan Sanders, on behalf of the Independent Miners Guild. **** Transmission Closed ****