• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General News and Announcements
« Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 46 Next »
Admin Notice: Rules regarding Player Owned Bases

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Task Force Akhetaten - 0 / 10,000
Crayter Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Gaian Escort - 0 / 10,000
Atum's Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Seekers - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Interdictors - 0 / 10,000
Wild Hunters - 0 / 10,000
Wild Interceptors - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (12): « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12
Admin Notice: Rules regarding Player Owned Bases
Offline cerious
02-07-2014, 03:11 PM,
#111
Member
Posts: 20
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2012

Check here
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1477034
Reply  
Offline Zen_Mechanics
02-07-2014, 04:55 PM,
#112
Member
Posts: 2,262
Threads: 196
Joined: Oct 2012

this pob feature is just fine, but the aftermath is too much taken seriously. If you want to update cores only for officials, you could have done so without nerfing the rest, and without using the civil war in disco to push yet another resolution. I have had plenty of chances to see King's Cross, and Golden coin, but not once have I critisized it, I simply ignore it and take a different route. Think about it, You can spend your time taking a different route, infact a shorter time, instead of complaining over and over again. Mollys guarding the entrance to their "land" is fine by me, its legit, LN holding alaska jumpgate is legit, King's cross holding London from Gallia is legit.
It all makes sense, so on the one hand, you whine about insufficient RP, but then you ask these pobs to be removed because you dont want to RP with it, and possibly silent trade. Having these "annoying" pobs forces people to stay longer, the longer they stay, the longer we have activity, and the bigger chance to meet someone. The good overrides the bad.

Were fools to make war on our brothers in arms.

Reply  
Offline Highland Laddie
02-07-2014, 05:17 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-07-2014, 05:19 PM by Highland Laddie.)
#113
Member
Posts: 2,082
Threads: 21
Joined: Mar 2013

Again Tel, there's a point where, for the sake of keeping the server happy, fun, and active, that RP must be sacrificed for actual in-game play.

Sure...it would probably make AMAZING RP sense for Bretonia to build 3 PoBs at every Jump Hole and Gate that enters New London and then surround it with 6 defense platforms each...making New London basically an impenetrable fortress. But....that would also kill activity entirely.

PoBs that effectively cut off systems, while making sense inRP, kill activity. There's apparently plenty of evidence to support this, and I think there'd be an overwhelming support if you put a poll out there asking if blocking PoBs should be outright illegal. I'd be surprised if there isn't such a poll out there already...given how some like to create them.
Reply  
Pages (12): « Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode