• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 188 189 190 191 192 … 198 Next »
Rule question concerning piracy

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Task Force Akhetaten - 0 / 10,000
Crayter Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Gaian Escort - 0 / 10,000
Atum's Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Seekers - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Interdictors - 0 / 10,000
Wild Hunters - 0 / 10,000
Wild Interceptors - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Rule question concerning piracy
Offline Robert.Fitzgerald
04-04-2008, 01:28 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 1,727
Threads: 32
Joined: Feb 2008

I think the proposed pirating idea is fine under the rules and in roleplay, but for example.. Pirating both sides of a jump gate would probably be not. Since when the trader emerges he'll be blasted immediately, with hardly any chance to respond/check group numbers.

[Image: GatewaySig.png]
~Gateway Interstellar~ Gateway)Gibraltar
Gateway Corporate Profile - Gateway Message Dump - Gateway Recruitment - Gateway Faction Feedback
  Reply  
Offline MrCynical
04-04-2008, 01:57 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 301
Threads: 10
Joined: Jan 2008

I think from a rules point of view, your second man would have to stop firing if the trader agreed to pay. This is the case where two (or more) pirates are in the same place so there's no reason that I can see why it wouldn't apply to your idea.

No longer active online due to a dwindling amount of non-PvP (trading, pirating, mining, etc.) fun in the new version.
  Reply  
Offline caylith
04-04-2008, 02:42 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-04-2008, 02:45 PM by caylith.)
#13
Member
Posts: 551
Threads: 44
Joined: Mar 2006

A way to do it would be to respond to your buddy's demand, in system chat, while you're waiting down the TL.

I'm not comfortable with the grouped/unit thing. Yes, if you're in the same system, sure. But there've been players who've gotten sanctioned because they were grouped with pirating players while in a cap ship. They were there but didn't actually fire or say anything. But they were grouped with the pirating vessels. Hmm, we'll have to mull this one over, methinks.

(don't know if any of that made sense...only on my second cup o' coffee)
Reply  
Offline Robert.Fitzgerald
04-04-2008, 02:52 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 1,727
Threads: 32
Joined: Feb 2008

I understand your views Caylith, but surely if they operate on one tradelane it should be okay?

The Lane Hackers often have different members stationed in different areas when pirating. We don't necessarily rely on the first Hacker's demands, but it's similar to this method.

[Image: GatewaySig.png]
~Gateway Interstellar~ Gateway)Gibraltar
Gateway Corporate Profile - Gateway Message Dump - Gateway Recruitment - Gateway Faction Feedback
  Reply  
Offline SimonBlack
04-04-2008, 06:49 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 1,027
Threads: 57
Joined: Dec 2007

Thats a good idea. First guy could be a polite kind of pirate (like Bundschuh) merely negotiating and posing no real threat, while the other one is dumb muscle, doing what his not-so-dumb friends tells him to. Yay! I want to be a dumb muscle!

[Image: 14imk5h.jpg]
Character background summaries:
Red Hessians Major Matthias Schwarz
Golden Chrysanthemums Chusa Fumiko Shimazu
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
04-04-2008, 06:56 PM,
#16
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

i think it must be presented as a very clear situation. only when there is NO doubt that these pirates are working as a team, they should be allowed to stage such an ambush. - and i mean it must be clear from the point of view of the ambushed player, not the pirates.

that involves indeed system chat - or - and thats better ... in local chat ( but its disabled atm ) - of course, adding a ship bigger than a gunboat ( even if its not interfering ) should not be allowed. - ignoring it is metagaming - and the point of not having a cruiser or bigger is that its too expensive to have these ships deployed for pirating ( at least for the simple act of "daily" piracy routine ).

to be safe and leave little room to misinterprete the situation, i d suggest to have both members of the group in scanner range ( like one or two lane sections, i think one section is 5000 meters? ) - then it should be clear that both pirates are one unit.

asking for a tax, but not pursuing the trader when he attempts to escape - but then opening fire instantly when he leaves a lane can and will cause misinterpretation of the situation, - especially when the second pirate will "finish the job, no matter what".

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Capt. Henry Morgan
04-04-2008, 07:00 PM,
#17
Natio Octavarium
Posts: 1,739
Threads: 160
Joined: Feb 2008

' Wrote:asking for a tax, but not pursuing the trader when he attempts to escape - but then opening fire instantly when he leaves a lane can and will cause misinterpretation of the situation, - especially when the second pirate will "finish the job, no matter what".

I was thinking that the second person would say something like "you should have paid the man", then start shooting... he would of course stop if the trader agrees to pay. Thats just common courtesy.

I was also thinking of disrupting the TL halfway instead of waiting for them to come out the other end, that way traders who pay the first person wouldn't have to stop for the second.

[Image: pyBjInU.png]

Natio Octavarium
Faction Information and Status • Recruitment
Faction Feedback • Internal Affairs
Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode