• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 195 196 197 198 199 … 779 Next »
Empty systems, left it or delete it

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: What will do with "empty" systems?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Left it as it is
10.00%
4 10.00%
We need delete some "empty" systems
62.50%
25 62.50%
Add more systems for exploring.
27.50%
11 27.50%
Total 40 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
Empty systems, left it or delete it
Offline Xenosaga
12-22-2012, 01:19 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 497
Threads: 35
Joined: Oct 2010

(12-18-2012, 03:41 PM)AeternusDoleo Wrote: It is technically quite possible to make a few systems "detached" - that is, make their dockable objects unselectable (and therefor non-dockable, undock only) and leave them with a single oneway jumphole in the center of the system. Systems like that would cease to be a part of the gaming world. I proposed that idea to the rest of the devs very early in the dev cycle and it was rejected. Cannon specifically asked for two way jumps to allow players to access every system that was previously accessible in the mod (with the exception of New Anglia and New Cambria, which have been physically deleted. Hope noone decided to be a goof and leave something docked there).

The galaxy layout for 4.87 has been decided upon - it was a prerequisite for economy development and infocard development. It can no longer change without basically throwing away all economy and infocard work. So this would be something that can be reconsidered for 4.88 at the earliest.

So, you're saying that 4.87 will yield even more systems or simply that systems which were brought-in once will stay forever because of character file related reasons?
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode