• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community The Community Real Life Discussion Software & Hardware
« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 91 Next »
Using 2 internet connections simultaneously

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Task Force Akhetaten - 0 / 10,000
Crayter Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Gaian Escort - 0 / 10,000
Atum's Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Seekers - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Interdictors - 0 / 10,000
Wild Hunters - 0 / 10,000
Wild Interceptors - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Using 2 internet connections simultaneously
Offline Dimon
05-14-2015, 01:26 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 940
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2012

It is not Flood subforum.
Please keep your posts having connection to the issue which have been given to the thread.

(flood posts have been cleaned up)
Reply  
Offline Unlucky_Soul
05-14-2015, 05:28 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-14-2015, 05:38 AM by Unlucky_Soul.)
#12
Member
Posts: 622
Threads: 56
Joined: Nov 2013

(05-14-2015, 01:05 AM)Alley Wrote: You can't -combine- internets to have better speed.

The existing technique is called load balancing (Double WAN, Quad WAN) and will not accomplish that.

(05-13-2015, 10:41 PM)13CentKiller Wrote: You can't "combine" them as such, but you can load balance and take advantage of fail over with a load balancing switch.

They are expensive and you may not even notice the load balancing happening unless your were caining very large torrents on a very high speed connection. You're not going to notice a difference browsing or watching YouTube.

Well thanks for the inputs. Well does load balancing help in better connectivity while playing disco? I understand it will not lower ping but will it reduce packet losses ?

[Image: oNG6Z9E.gif]
Reply  
Offline 13CentKiller
05-18-2015, 06:59 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 1,635
Threads: 88
Joined: Jan 2007

When you connect to a server, the server will recognize an IP address, sending return information to that address specifically. The second connection would go completely unused with regards to your connection to the server in question.

However, if you lost your connection, you could re-connect on your second line instantaneously without having to wait for the first line to come back up. You'd just have a different IP address.

If say you wanted to download digital content from a specific address on one connection and play Freelancer on the other, this would allow you to continue playing your game without the additional packets from content unrelated to Freelancer interrupting your gameplay. It would keep your ping stable and packet loss from Freelancer to a minimum. This is a significant job setting this up, but the same effect can be achieved with my suggestion below.

Your easiest option by far (and the cheapest) is to simply have two jack-points installed for the individual lines coming in to the house and a separate router for each allowing you to manually balance what content is downloaded or uploaded on either line individually.

For example. Your seedbox could be on your 100/100 fibre connection, connected via a router which also served household wireless networks to keep browsing and email and streaming internet TV, (and other mundane tasks) away from Freelancer. A second router would provide you with a dedicated ADSL/VDSL/Cable connection (or other) specifically for you and you alone on a totally separate uncongested connection.

It's far easier to set up prioritization rules on a single network to allow Facebook/Twitter/YouTube/Internet TV first priority over torrents and other content than it is to use a single balancer across two networks designed to do totally different things and make rules so neither network never ever interferes with one another.

Disclaimer: I'm really sick right now. I hope that made sense.
  Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode