• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 170 171 172 173 174 … 386 Next »
BMF feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8
Thread Closed 
BMF feedback
Offline jammi
01-01-2016, 11:33 PM,
#71
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,548
Threads: 360
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

(01-01-2016, 11:21 PM)Ace Razgriz Wrote:
(01-01-2016, 10:58 PM)DonSam Wrote: I don't see it as metagaming, If BMF switched to BAF caps to defend their business? specially that BMF are not allowed to fly caps, look it from different way, if BMF were allowed to fly caps and they switched to caps to defend their business will that be metagaming? I guess we need an admin to answer this. I guess admins have to allow BMF to switch to BAF caps on urgent matters only, or to allow BMF to fly caps then.

Its definately oorp, wouldnt really call it metagaming i guess... but thats like a really scumbag move to log a cap alt to deal with any problems
Er. What. If I'm playing a corporate character and a raid rolls in, I'm definitely going to swap to another ship that's better suited to deal with the situation if I can. I wouldn't recommend anyone try to charge a Legate with a Shetland.

Logging a random unrelated ship to cover your faction mates is bad, yeah - like if you were to have a CR/IMG/Exile cruiser protecting BMM miners in Dublin or something. But if they're logging BAF ships that would reasonably be responding to that situation anyway, not seeing a massive problem.
Offline Ace Razgriz
01-01-2016, 11:34 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-01-2016, 11:39 PM by Ace Razgriz.)
#72
Member
Posts: 833
Threads: 105
Joined: Feb 2013

(01-01-2016, 11:33 PM)jammi Wrote:
(01-01-2016, 11:21 PM)Ace Razgriz Wrote:
(01-01-2016, 10:58 PM)DonSam Wrote: I don't see it as metagaming, If BMF switched to BAF caps to defend their business? specially that BMF are not allowed to fly caps, look it from different way, if BMF were allowed to fly caps and they switched to caps to defend their business will that be metagaming? I guess we need an admin to answer this. I guess admins have to allow BMF to switch to BAF caps on urgent matters only, or to allow BMF to fly caps then.

Its definately oorp, wouldnt really call it metagaming i guess... but thats like a really scumbag move to log a cap alt to deal with any problems
Er. What. If I'm playing a corporate character and a raid rolls in, I'm definitely going to swap to another ship that's better suited to deal with the situation if I can. I would recommend anyone try to charge a Legate with a Shetland.

Except I've seen these people use caps against ANY threat... from enemy snubs to bombers they bring in kirks and carriers and stuff. Theres protecting your corporation, then theres going overboard.
Offline VaaMerc
01-01-2016, 11:48 PM,
#73
Member
Posts: 29
Threads: 7
Joined: Dec 2015

(01-01-2016, 11:34 PM)Ace Razgriz Wrote:
(01-01-2016, 11:33 PM)jammi Wrote:
(01-01-2016, 11:21 PM)Ace Razgriz Wrote:
(01-01-2016, 10:58 PM)DonSam Wrote: I don't see it as metagaming, If BMF switched to BAF caps to defend their business? specially that BMF are not allowed to fly caps, look it from different way, if BMF were allowed to fly caps and they switched to caps to defend their business will that be metagaming? I guess we need an admin to answer this. I guess admins have to allow BMF to switch to BAF caps on urgent matters only, or to allow BMF to fly caps then.

Its definately oorp, wouldnt really call it metagaming i guess... but thats like a really scumbag move to log a cap alt to deal with any problems
Er. What. If I'm playing a corporate character and a raid rolls in, I'm definitely going to swap to another ship that's better suited to deal with the situation if I can. I would recommend anyone try to charge a Legate with a Shetland.

Except I've seen these people use caps against ANY threat... from enemy snubs to bombers they bring in kirks and carriers and stuff. Theres protecting your corporation, then theres going overboard.

Exactly. It honestly hurts roleplay when two Caps respond to deal with a Single fighter.
Offline DonSam
01-01-2016, 11:49 PM,
#74
Member
Posts: 182
Threads: 20
Joined: Nov 2015

It's just that the guys just bought their brand new caps and they like to fly it to learn some new skills on PVP against all, but we will ask them not to fly caps again, thanks all.
Offline Malmsteen
01-01-2016, 11:49 PM, (This post was last modified: 01-01-2016, 11:56 PM by Malmsteen.)
#75
Member
Posts: 288
Threads: 21
Joined: Nov 2015

This thread turned from Feedback to spam/troll fest
No proof and false accusation

@DonSam Please do not reply anymore on this thread - This thread will be deleted soon and a proper one free from flames will be opened
Also - please let the leader of the group reply back since you tend to understand things in a wrong way my friend
Nothing bad here, it's just some people will leave the game and stay here to flame tho every single word they say is false,
For example: Wesker guy claiming that these caps belong to us while he have no idea about what he is saying, since those caps dont belong to us
and also he flame without sending proof - we told him more than one time, to deliver to admins these evidences but it seems he have none and only here to flame

Close this thread
This is not the feedback of KHara faction!!
This is not a place for everyone to come and feel trolly because he got killed or whatever
it shouldn't be opened by a non-bmf member
It shouldn't be a place for flaming
It should be re organized and flamers get their posts deleted immediately because we are not here for you to waste our times
I don't like being annoyed everyday i read these forums.. because flaming is at it's max! - please don't force us to just leave or disband this group.

Have a nice day
Offline Cashew
01-02-2016, 12:03 AM,
#76
Member
Posts: 1,140
Threads: 89
Joined: Nov 2013

Closed on "apparent leader" of BMF's request.
Pages (8): « Previous 1 … 4 5 6 7 8
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode