• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 198 Next »
Rules of re-engagement, clarification required

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Rules of re-engagement, clarification required
Offline Suspense
03-03-2017, 10:09 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-03-2017, 10:29 PM by Suspense.)
#1
Member
Posts: 19
Threads: 5
Joined: Feb 2017

Good evening!

I'm looking for clarification about what counts as an end to an engagement or player interaction. I've been in the following situation:

1. friendly destroyer in ZOI under attack by 2 hostile destroyers (i.e. it was being fired upon)
2. write into system chat: (1) "what the actual --" and then (2) "hang on, help is coming!", then wait ~10 seconds
3. land a few salvos on one of the destroyers, as a snub, the inRP idea was to recognize an ineffective engagement and come back with help
4. get trash-talked in // ooRP chat
5. searched around for nearby friendlies in chat to gather help
6. friendly destroyer rekt, attackers remain in position
7. keep stalking around cloaked, gathering intel on hostiles, saying a word every now and then into local chat (although I'm not quite sure they also received it, I was near 15k at this time)
8. help arrives, 2 friendly destroyers
9. friendlies start new RP talk, I don't (I could have too, but choose not to)
10. friendlies open fire, I'm tasked with maintaining CD
11. get trash talked in PM and // ooRP chat for several minutes for "engaging twice without RP" and "spamming CD, even though they weren't using cruise engines"

Now I didn't respond to any of the trash-talking, because I felt there was no point in doing so. Was I right ignoring it, or did I mis-interpret the RP rules? In my interpretation, for me, this was one single engagement, against a hostile ID, in my ZOI, and by first giving enough time to react.

Am I right to assume that my interpretation of the RP rules was correct?
Reply  
Offline Shizune
03-03-2017, 10:31 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 1,256
Threads: 201
Joined: Mar 2012

Unless they saw you docking and got the green message, or shot you down personally, you have not broken any rules. If you got outside of their scan range, docked and repaired (or whatever) and came back, then your fine. The "If you cruise away" rule was removed sometime ago.

Your not the one at fault here, the second you started getting PM'd ooRPly is when the enemies should of been promply reported. So no, your completely fine unless they did shoot you down OR if they saw your dock message
Reply  
Offline Suspense
03-03-2017, 10:34 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 19
Threads: 5
Joined: Feb 2017

(03-03-2017, 10:31 PM)Shizune Wrote: Unless they saw you docking and got the green message, or shot you down personally, you have not broken any rules.

Thank you for the clarification, neither of these happened.
Reply  
Offline Calo
03-03-2017, 11:21 PM,
#4
Banned
Posts: 158
Threads: 23
Joined: Feb 2017

Quote:7. keep stalking around cloaked, gathering intel on hostiles, saying a word every now and then into local chat (although I'm not quite sure they also received it, I was near 15k at this time)

This needs green clarification, because gathering info while cloaked (e.g. in order to give someone FR5 as official faction) was raised a few times on the forums.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=148882
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline HanCloudstone
03-04-2017, 12:25 AM,
#5
Bulwark of Kyushu
Posts: 515
Threads: 41
Joined: Jan 2017

How is gathering intel while cloaked wrong, however? I mean, it's a stealth device, it's working as intended. A tool of spies and ambushers.

My char info and rp feedback thread

Currently schizoposting from Omicron Chi
Reply  
Offline Calo
03-04-2017, 01:04 AM,
#6
Banned
Posts: 158
Threads: 23
Joined: Feb 2017

(03-04-2017, 12:25 AM)HanCloudstone Wrote: How is gathering intel while cloaked wrong, however? I mean, it's a stealth device, it's working as intended. A tool of spies and ambushers.

Basically, this thread.

User was banned for: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=148882
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode