• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 558 559 560 561 562 … 778 Next »
Rep Fixing

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Rep Fixing
Offline guitarguy
04-13-2009, 01:24 AM,
#1
Member
Posts: 429
Threads: 30
Joined: Nov 2008

So I'm rep fixing for another capship, and I started thinking, why do we need guard IDs? How does forcing a player to do forty or more missions in a VHF useful to the community? Let's run through the arguments for guard IFFs/IDs

1) This forces the player to experience the server RP before hopping in a shiny new capital.

Nope, rather than interact with other players, people who are rep fixing are thinking "How many more effing missions do I have to do?!?!" Plus, couldn't they experience RP while trading for credits?

2) It limits the number of capital ships.

Not really, anyone with the patience to do the missions and trade (or has a friend with credits) can get one.

In my humble opinion, we should do away with guard IDs and go back to the 4.84 way of doing it. (Standard ID gives you access to all of a faction's ships.) If you want a guard IFF, fine, but let's not make those of us who want to stop doing missions and start RPing waste time with missions.

Thoughts? I'll answer any other arguments for keeping guard IDs as well.


[Image: dfcz.png][Image: frcl.png][Image: dscz.jpg][Image: 19979982.jpg]
[Image: u3cld.jpg]
| BAF Faction Information | BAF War Bonds | BAF Training Program | BAF Combat Training Manual |
  Reply  
Offline tazuras
04-13-2009, 02:41 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,179
Threads: 69
Joined: Feb 2008

One thing it does do is provide unique rules for those required to use them, that are different than the standard ID. This I like. And proving loyalty to your faction before you can get a cap ship, this I also like.

And it can help you get a better grip on the RP. If you want to do it at a reasonable rate you will be getting people to help you. This not only makes you interact with them and make friends within the faction but may lead to some discussions of RP.

[Image: l2gnAQh.png]
Reply  
Offline Robert.Fitzgerald
04-13-2009, 06:06 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 1,727
Threads: 32
Joined: Feb 2008

Guard IDs are useful as they have different restrictions and benefits to the basic faction ID. They allow players to act a different roleplay, as they are playing a different section of the faction.

Example, Bounty Hunters Guild. Core players should not have to use the basic Bounty Hunter ID, as capital ships would be allowed to roam sirius and all ship types would have to have bounties on Order and Nomads in orer to attack them. They are at war, and the Core does not collect bounties (they're a military). The new ID allows Core players to roleplay properly with appropriate restrictions and benefits.

[Image: GatewaySig.png]
~Gateway Interstellar~ Gateway)Gibraltar
Gateway Corporate Profile - Gateway Message Dump - Gateway Recruitment - Gateway Faction Feedback
  Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
04-13-2009, 07:44 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

They have their advantages and disadvantages.

I think they should be optionally available for purchase and not carry restrictions on what ship can be combined with what ID.

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode