• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 384 385 386 387 388 … 547 Next »
Hull Upgrades

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Should fighter/bomber/GB hull upgrades be removed?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
33.33%
9 33.33%
No
59.26%
16 59.26%
Don't care/no opinion
7.41%
2 7.41%
Total 27 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Hull Upgrades
Offline FooFighter
07-05-2009, 04:55 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 726
Threads: 32
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:Does this really need to be changed? As far as I'm concerend the system works well.

Besides, you can't remove an item from the game. Causes problems for anyone who has the item in their possession. Considering nearly every ship has one... player wipe, anyone?

Don't worry, there are good ways of getting rid of items without removing them from the game. Just change the hull upgrade so it won't have any effect, make it unbuyable and rise it's price so you can sell it for the same price you've bought it.

Div: mind elaborating why? It would lead to the same situation we have right now - everybody would just mount the AU with the highest protection grade. If you'd restrict certain factions from mounting certain hull upgrades, it'll just lead to all the PvP-whores flocking to said faction and other factions getting ganked by them (just like it was back when the BHG wasn't restricted to fighting only people which actually happen to have a bounty on their head).
Reply  
Offline tazuras
07-05-2009, 05:05 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 2,179
Threads: 69
Joined: Feb 2008

I dont mind armor upgrades, I dont mind the price being where it is. In this most recent version it was made so you could get a much higher armor rating on lower armors, and that helps people find a happy middle ground I think.

Otherwise, keep the price, it keeps people trading which keeps the server alive and full of activity.

If there was something instituted to make a disadvantage to owning armor, I would say perhaps a small reduction in maneuverability or a maintenance cost so you had to continually pay to keep the armor. This would probably reduce the number of characters that mount it.

[Image: l2gnAQh.png]
Reply  
Offline AdamantineFist
07-05-2009, 06:10 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 2,177
Threads: 28
Joined: Feb 2008

I'm pretty much 100% behind removing and integratng fighter armour. Seeing as EVERYONE except the noobiest of noobs mounts Mk VIII armour on their fighters and bombers, and it just raises the cost of fighters so friggin' much. Cap armour should stay, I think, as it makes rather more sense. Just drop the cost of the igh-end ones a bit, I think. As to adding disadvantages, let's not worry about that just yet.

So, as to the fighter armour removal by integration: YES.

Cap armour removal by integration: NO.

Adding disadvantages to armour upgrades: NO.

[Image: FistShroom.png][Image: OORPShroom.png][Image: bowexbar.jpg][Image: RheinlandShroom.png][Image: BretoniaShroom.png]
[Image: adacopieky9.png]
[Image: frcl.jpg]
  Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode