• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 371 372 373 374 375 … 547 Next »
we should totally have this

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3
we should totally have this
Offline Death.RunningVerminator
08-26-2009, 07:09 PM,
#21
Member
Posts: 4,308
Threads: 143
Joined: Nov 2008

Ya, we should definitely the Radar jammer
Reply  
Offline Tommeh
08-26-2009, 07:41 PM,
#22
Member
Posts: 1,596
Threads: 31
Joined: Jan 2009

hmm,both interesting ideas,I like jamming more :)
Could be fun,if it would be used only on spy ship.
You scout enemy fleet,they scout yours,both brings ships that are good against enemy type of fleet and it turns out epic battle :laugh:

[Image: final3.png]
Reply  
Offline atlantis2112
08-26-2009, 08:52 PM,
#23
Member
Posts: 1,350
Threads: 125
Joined: Apr 2009

Quote:Radar jammer would be so easily abused to do... Just about anything... The only people I can see being granted access to it would be those such as Mon'Star, Phantom/Wilde/Nomad bombers/fighters,

Ugh, Don't get me started on this..
  Reply  
Offline JakeSG
08-26-2009, 10:08 PM,
#24
Member
Posts: 1,113
Threads: 30
Joined: Aug 2008

Ohlul! Admin facshun conspiraceh!

Don't get me wrong, I'd sooner see it not implemented at all, but if a few key Dev's were to suddenly turn senile and implement this, I'd rather only a handful of people have access to it.

For the Core.
  Reply  
Offline X-Lancer
08-26-2009, 10:32 PM,
#25
Member
Posts: 1,173
Threads: 147
Joined: Jan 2007

' Wrote:Jamming is really nice, but could be easily abused. Someone could walk up your back, where you are not looking to shoot you and get a kill.

Unless it is a capital ship like a Spyglass (can be seen at 20k XD), you are flying as if you were really cloaked. Space is wide heh.

But a cool alternative could be a low signature membrane. You'd only be detected at 5-7.5k instead of 15(?). The low signature membrane could act as an armor upgrade, taking cargo space and giving a small armor multiplier (1.75, half of a mk8) [needs balancing]. I do not know if this is doable, but we've seen everything lately.

It would only be useful on fighters and bombers (should be mountable only by them).


Big ships couldn't use them since they would still logically appear on scanners because of their huge size.


disagreed

like i said, Nomad VHF/LF, Order stealth light fighter, any sort of Recon ship only, those ships are not the ship can be easily abuse
  Reply  
Offline Turkish
08-26-2009, 10:37 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-26-2009, 10:38 PM by Turkish.)
#26
Member
Posts: 2,617
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2007

Yes they could. Equiping a Nomad LF with a practical cloak and having it fall into the wrong hands? Bad, but that isn't to say that it shouldn't be done.

What both camps need to realise is that both points are true, but no one should outweigh the other without careful discussion and thought. As it stands our game dynamics get static at times, so this could get things rolling in some sectors.

[Image: LibreIISuper_Small.png]

I have a fetish for all things Norse.
  Reply  
Offline lab205
08-26-2009, 11:02 PM,
#27
Member
Posts: 32
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2008

I like the probe idea for the missile cam that someone mentioned earlier.
Also, I think the radar jamming would be a great addition; playing off a couple peoples ideas, we could make it take an armor upgrade slot and using it would drain energy.

[Image: Untitled.png]
  Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode