• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 13 14 15 16 17 … 28 Next »
mid sized armored and armed transport

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Task Force Akhetaten - 0 / 10,000
Crayter Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Gaian Escort - 0 / 10,000
Atum's Battlegroup - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Seekers - 0 / 10,000
Wendigo Interdictors - 0 / 10,000
Wild Hunters - 0 / 10,000
Wild Interceptors - 0 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Thread Closed 
mid sized armored and armed transport
Offline Ursus
11-16-2012, 05:34 PM,
#51
Member
Posts: 3,853
Threads: 249
Joined: Oct 2011

container pods are awesome. all ships should use container pods. and we should have more container pods to choose from for RP purposes. why does the Uruz have gas pods? why dont we have gas pods to put on other ships?

we should have freighters with pods too, for off-loading cargo from transports and inter-base traffic. http://discoverygc.com/wiki/CTE_FR-2302-..._Freighter should use a pod

Discovery 24/7 Negotiating Tactics:

[Image: smuggler-threat-0-1.jpg]
Offline Croft
11-16-2012, 05:35 PM,
#52
Member
Posts: 1,642
Threads: 124
Joined: Oct 2011

The Firefly needs to be removed solely on the fact that it is not an original design, it's an import that much is set in stone. At the end of the day it's pointless asking for new transports as people just aren't interested in doing them.

Jimmy The Rat | Croft's Feedback | The Rat Pack
Offline Govedo13
11-16-2012, 05:38 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-16-2012, 05:38 PM by Govedo13.)
#53
Member
Posts: 4,663
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2009

(11-16-2012, 05:30 PM)Jinx Wrote: have no use / support for them regarding to their lore.
Well civilian ship with tons of support and tons of lore reasons to replace the firefly got rejected because you have no interest in finishing it because it is some random civilian non zoner thing I see.

We stack lies and excuses here. It would be just better for all- devs and players when you post your concepts in the media center and does not flood the ship submissions with ships that you have no intention to submit.

€œ
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

Offline AeternusDoleo
11-23-2012, 09:21 AM,
#54
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

So, let another dev see if they can build a more heavily armed transport based on the Gull. Jinx withdrew this one, so this discussion is done.

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Thread Closed 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode