• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 196 197 198 199 200 … 779 Next »
heavy electro-magnetic disruptor

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Do we need electro-magnetic cloak disruptors?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
YES!
47.83%
11 47.83%
No.
47.83%
11 47.83%
Dont know.
4.35%
1 4.35%
Total 23 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
heavy electro-magnetic disruptor
Offline Veygaar
12-18-2012, 05:08 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-18-2012, 07:09 AM by Veygaar.)
#11
Member
Posts: 4,212
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2011

You're concept of what is powerful, what is weak, and what will make what too powerful is flawed.

Veygaar for Admin Moderator 2013!!!
[Image: tumblr_mhigevrWmO1qh09nho1_500.gif]
Reply  
Offline SummerMcLovin
12-18-2012, 05:55 AM,
#12
Former Admin
Posts: 3,080
Threads: 73
Joined: May 2012

The actual implementation is up to the balance team/other devs, but I have voted yes to the idea of some form of anti-cloak technology. I have for a while, but a couple of new Outcast battleships who make heavy use of the "cloak, run, resupply, repeat" strategy have added weight to this opinion.

Kingdom of Bretonia
Colonial Republic
Independent Miners Guild
Ex-Admin
Reply  
Offline JayDee Kasane
12-18-2012, 06:19 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 51
Joined: Apr 2011

Im up for the idea to add this ability to just Incapacitor torpedo. recloaking snubs wont do as much problems as battleships, also snubs is not ballanced for cloaks, at least standart VHFs or light Bombers, things like Thor is more cloak-able.

[Image: 6FadQ6bTk_g.jpg]
Reply  
Offline DelBoy
12-18-2012, 07:06 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 84
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2012

I remember reading somewhere that some dev proposed an idea about incapacitor torps being able to negate the cloak ...was digging but cant find it ;/
Tho voting Yes coz it's an good idea!
Reply  
Offline why_so_serious
12-18-2012, 09:02 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-18-2012, 09:04 AM by why_so_serious.)
#15
Member
Posts: 328
Threads: 11
Joined: Jun 2011

Na, Rorry. Cruisers are up at best. They need more weapons, so BS's cant run with cloaks from them.

But seriously. You sound like an child who wants to put his little favourite "good against most ship classes" toy into an "good-against-everything" toy. I bet the idea came up as a BS managed to run away with its cloak from your cruisers.

Anyway like some mention above, only bomber or -yes why not HF's should be able to disrupt Cloaks. So even Big cap fleets are forced to use at least some Snubs as anti cloak tool.
But the chance to disrupt an cloak should be even less than disrupting an cruise engine.

The idea itself is okay but i think i already read something that there wont be any anti cloak weapon (not sure right now).


They see me fightin', they hatin'

=Apply for Rorry's Renegades=
Reply  
Offline Lonely_Ghost
12-18-2012, 09:22 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 1,217
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2010

Anti Cloak indeed usefull, but I'd rather put it on fighter/bomber. I totaly agree to give another role for a snubs, rather than give some more devices to capital ships.
Giving to incapacitor torps decloak ability nearly perfect idea.
Reply  
Offline Hone
12-18-2012, 09:28 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-18-2012, 10:00 AM by Hone.)
#17
Banned
Posts: 4,577
Threads: 287
Joined: Jan 2010

(12-18-2012, 09:02 AM)why_so_serious Wrote: The idea itself is okay but i think i already read something that there wont be any anti cloak weapon (not sure right now).

Things change

(04-29-2007, 05:07 PM)Igiss Wrote: Requests that should not be posted here



7. Requests for implementing cloaks. They won't exist in this mod.

User was banned for: Griefing others
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline Lonely_Ghost
12-18-2012, 09:40 AM, (This post was last modified: 12-18-2012, 09:44 AM by Lonely_Ghost.)
#18
Member
Posts: 1,217
Threads: 48
Joined: Nov 2010

Igiss doesn't see it anyway now Tongue
+ Why it should not exist? I mean, it's technicaly can't be done or just...
Reply  
Offline why_so_serious
12-18-2012, 09:50 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 328
Threads: 11
Joined: Jun 2011

I just searched for the thread again. Cant find it anymore maybe i misread something.


They see me fightin', they hatin'

=Apply for Rorry's Renegades=
Reply  
Offline monmarfori
12-18-2012, 10:01 AM,
#20
Son of Malta
Posts: 2,159
Threads: 288
Joined: Jan 2010

What happens if fighters escaping were hit? Either way it would be disastrous to them since they can't even run or cloak.
Reply  
Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode