• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 50 51 52 53 54 55 Next »
Planetary Defense Grids

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Planetary Defense Grids
Offline Eppy
02-03-2008, 09:47 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

As all the Outcasts know (and most of the Corsairs and IMG, too:lol:) I am rather fond of invoking, whenever the Outcasts are outnumbered (almost always) Malta's massive Planetary Defense Grid, packing thousands of nukes, for all your self-defense needs. Unfortunately, this Planetary Defense Grid is a fiction, existing only in the rumors on Malta's bar. Now, Malta can't be the only planet to have something like this; others have to have it, too. And, as I've observed lately, it's far too easy to just park in front of a planet and sit there with a couple of Battleships, shooting anything that comes out of the tradelanes. So, why don't we start making REAL Planetary Defense Grids, for all the major planets? a dozen or so missile platforms with very fast missiles for killing small ships and very long-range, high-damage missiles with big explosion effects for the Battleships? It would make fights and sieges a LOT more interesting, I think, and much more realistic.

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline LancerZero
02-03-2008, 09:50 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 852
Threads: 52
Joined: Oct 2007

Ooooh....interesting. I like the idea. If not this specific idea, at least some form of more potent defense for the major inhabited worlds. Maybe gun platforms...something easy for fighters to dodge, but that caps have to keep away from.

Current Stories
Linus' Lackadaisical Logs(upd.3-1-10)
Archived Logs
In the Queen's Service(upd.4-21-10) | The Finer Things in Life (upd.4-8-10)
Silvy's Story(upd.2-29-08) | Conrad's Flight & Fight(upd.1-14-08)
Reply  
Offline Lucend
02-03-2008, 09:57 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 506
Threads: 29
Joined: Sep 2007

/signed

But I would say that the platforms need to be disable-able. (It's Sunday, I'm allowed to have bad grammar)


"The thirteen saloons that had lined the one street of Seney had not left a trace. The foundations of the Mansion House hotel stuck up above the ground. The stone was chipped and split by the fire. It was all that was left of the town of Seney. Even the surface had been burned off the ground.
Nick looked at the burned-over stretch of hillside, where he had expected to find the scattered houses of the town and then walked down the railroad track to the bridge over the river. The river was there."

Osaika Moto, the Fall and Rise of a Kusari Farmer

Juan Lucendez, √ Corsair
  Reply  
Offline Eppy
02-03-2008, 10:03 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 3,865
Threads: 162
Joined: Apr 2007

No, bad idea. Remember, these are supposed to be nukes launched from the GROUND. Unless it can be modded where the planet itself spawns the missiles, that won't work.

Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
Eppy Wrote:Which Dreadnought was that?
n00bl3t Wrote:One of your nine. Tongue
Reply  
Offline LancerZero
02-03-2008, 10:05 PM,
#5
Member
Posts: 852
Threads: 52
Joined: Oct 2007

Why put them on the ground? Makes the whole process much slower and more difficult, because the missiles have to break the planet's escape velocity and get into space before they can pose a threat. Does the rumor specifically say they're on the ground?

Current Stories
Linus' Lackadaisical Logs(upd.3-1-10)
Archived Logs
In the Queen's Service(upd.4-21-10) | The Finer Things in Life (upd.4-8-10)
Silvy's Story(upd.2-29-08) | Conrad's Flight & Fight(upd.1-14-08)
Reply  
Offline McNeo
02-03-2008, 10:12 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-03-2008, 10:13 PM by McNeo.)
#6
Member
Posts: 3,424
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2006

I can forsee large problems, one of which being that it will be really really pointless to fly an LF if you get instakilled by weapons platforms..

However, the soloution to the problem of making them planetside launchers is easy. Put the weapons platforms inside the planet model. job done.

EDIT: I am not in favour of this concept, actually... what would smaller factions do, which have few allies ? (Xenos attacking Manhatten for example...)
  Reply  
Offline Dab
02-03-2008, 10:33 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-03-2008, 10:34 PM by Dab.)
#7
Member
Posts: 9,570
Threads: 320
Joined: Aug 2005

' Wrote:a dozen or so missile platforms with very fast missiles for killing small ships and very long-range, high-damage missiles with big explosion effects for the Battleships? It would make fights and sieges a LOT more interesting, I think, and much more realistic.
And then when these big giant missile launchers target the fighters, it kills 4 at a time. Plus, weapon platforms are weapoon platforms.. You can't really make them look like a planetary defense grid. Plus, then even normal fights, where no one plans on 'bombarding' would be impossible.
If FL had variables like EVE that can increase or decrease the damage smaller ships and larger ships (smaller ships are hurt less by slow, big missiles) take from missiles, it'd work.. But we don't have that here.

[Image: DFinal.png]
Reply  
Offline kingvaillant
02-03-2008, 10:34 PM,
#8
Member
Posts: 2,961
Threads: 207
Joined: Aug 2007

well I like the Idea,

NY
NB
NT
NL
Malta
Crete
Gran Canaria
Toledo

should be protected be anti-cap ship defense platforms, shooting low speed bullet (E.g: Torpedo) so fighters can dodge it but capships cannot

Director of the Liberty Security Force: Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity
[Image: f_48123637838m_812390c.png]
The Amundsen Zone-21 Restrictions
  Reply  
Offline Zapp
02-03-2008, 10:35 PM,
#9
Member
Posts: 4,977
Threads: 267
Joined: Sep 2007

That's the point, McNeo. We shouldn't be attacking planets. They're too heavily fortified to attack. On my Outcasts, I never go near the planets, regardless of if there's anyone around or not.

This is just for those people that can't RP the planets being heavily fortified places where small enemy ships just don't go.

[Image: u8rHEaq.png]
Reply  
Offline Dab
02-03-2008, 10:37 PM,
#10
Member
Posts: 9,570
Threads: 320
Joined: Aug 2005

' Wrote:However, the soloution to the problem of making them planetside launchers is easy. Put the weapons platforms inside the planet model. job done.
Missed this one..
Either the weapon platforms get killed by the atmosphere damage, or there shots wouldn't make it through the crust of the planet.

[Image: DFinal.png]
Reply  
Pages (6): 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode